Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC CALISTA II

IMO: 9306067
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 8,328 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.90 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: CALISTO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Peter Dohle Schiffahrts KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,328 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

87.0 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−51%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

32.82

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+101%)

Average speed

11.6 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−13%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,303 t

CO₂ emitted

13,525 t

13,736 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

49,484 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,267 h

178 days, 49% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 87.0 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−51%)

78.8Ranks 364 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 13.3 (−13%)

9.1Faster than 27% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 32.82 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+101%)

7.22Ranks 1,740 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports74%
From the EU5%
Into the EU9%
At berth in the EU12%

44% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,896 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

11.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MSC CALISTA II
Container median

0.050.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC CALISTA II
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC CALISTA II
Container median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	+5%	+4%	−16%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−1%	−1%	+7%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	+426%	+411%	+11%	+528%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 426%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	−83%	−83%	+6%	−85%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 83%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+2.0 kn	+4%	+26%	+6%	+13%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.7 kn	+1%	−14%	−5%	−15%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+2.0 kn	+15%	+39%	−7%	+42%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Peter Dohle Schiffahrts KG	2,125	6,688	25,075	2,109	11.9	84.8	29.21	–
2025	Briallen Oceanway Limited	4,303	13,525	49,484	4,267	11.6	87.0	32.82	–
2024	Peter Dohle Schiffahrts KG	4,874	15,414	58,706	5,022	11.7	83.0	30.85	–
2023	not published	4,592	14,456	54,957	4,682	11.7	83.6	30.91	–
2022	not published	788	2,480	49,707	4,143	12.0	15.9	4.92	–
2021	not published	4,444	13,994	46,778	4,052	11.5	95.0	33.31	–
2020	not published	4,028	12,685	44,134	4,655	9.5	91.3	29.35	–
2019	not published	4,206	13,197	46,648	4,181	11.2	90.2	34.62	–
2018	not published	3,959	12,495	50,407	5,483	9.2	78.5	24.38	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Peter Dohle Schiffahrts KG	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2025	Briallen Oceanway Limited	32.82	16.30	+101%	1,740 of 2,208	EnvService	A+C
2024	Peter Dohle Schiffahrts KG	30.85	17.52	+76%	1,471 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	30.91	19.40	+59%	1,363 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	4.92	19.13	−74%	5 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	33.31	17.90	+86%	1,371 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	29.35	17.58	+67%	1,326 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	34.62	18.88	+83%	1,343 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	24.38	20.22	+21%	1,021 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.