Navalyze · Container · Ship

ADELINA

IMO: 9306079
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 6,355 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.92 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: ADELINA D

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,355 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

137.1 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

68.37

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+319%)

Average speed

9.3 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−30%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

395 t

CO₂ emitted

1,253 t

1,272 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

2,884 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

310 h

13 days, 4% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 137.1 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−23%)

78.8Ranks 828 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 9.3 kn · median 13.3 (−30%)

9.1Faster than 11% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 68.37 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+319%)

7.22Ranks 2,159 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU64%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU5%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (660 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ADELINA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

ADELINA
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ADELINA
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2025	+1.1 kn	+81%	+107%	−76%	+24%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 81%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−3.2 kn	−14%	−39%	−74%	+82%	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+12%	+9%	−17%	+1%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.6 kn	+4%	+21%	−1%	+2%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	+1%	+7%	−1%	−8%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.2 kn	+9%	−12%	−21%	−10%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	395	1,253	2,884	310	9.3	137.1	68.37	–
2024part-year	Peter Dohle Schiffahrts-KG	764	2,396	8,361	827	10.1	91.4	42.67	–
2023	not published	893	2,810	11,815	1,444	8.2	75.6	54.94	–
2022	not published	4,028	12,689	45,704	3,992	11.4	88.1	30.18	–
2021	not published	4,342	13,686	55,253	4,680	11.8	78.6	29.91	–
2020	not published	4,218	13,242	56,040	5,516	10.2	75.3	29.42	–
2019	not published	4,233	13,301	56,893	5,912	9.6	74.4	32.09	–
2018	not published	4,953	15,681	72,255	6,107	11.8	68.5	35.50	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	68.37	16.30	+319%	2,159 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024part-year	Peter Dohle Schiffahrts-KG	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2023	not published	54.94	19.40	+183%	1,739 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	30.18	19.13	+58%	1,301 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	29.91	17.90	+67%	1,298 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	29.42	17.58	+67%	1,326 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	32.09	18.88	+70%	1,302 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	35.50	20.22	+76%	1,267 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.