Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

METHANE JANE ELIZABETH

IMO: 9307190
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.53 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: GasLog LNG Services Ltd.

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

361

LNG carrier median 323 kg/nm (+12%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

19.0

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (+74%)

Average speed

16.9 kn

LNG carrier median 13.7 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

146.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,302 t

CO₂ emitted

20,128 t

Distance sailed

20,222 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,198 h

50 days, 14% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 333 kg/nm · median 205 (+63%)

148Ranks 285 of 312, lowest first328

Average speedThis ship 14.3 kn · median 14.6 (−2%)

11.0Faster than 43% of LNG carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 11.6 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (+57%)

4.54Ranks 249 of 312, lowest first17.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU52%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

3,359 t

46% of all fuel; 54% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

366 t

1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

METHANE JANE ELIZABETH
LNG carrier median

200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

METHANE JANE ELIZABETH
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

METHANE JANE ELIZABETH
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	+2%	+2%	+77%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	−33%	−28%	−21%	−53%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 33%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2022	−0.2 kn	+46%	+43%	+25%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 46%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−3.6 kn	−7%	−26%	−12%	+23%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	GasLog LNG Services Ltd.	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024LNG	GasLog LNG Services Ltd.	10,409	29,030	31,252	2,189	14.3	333	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	5,790	16,712	17,685	1,247	14.2	327	–	–
2022	not published	10,919	32,320	22,261	1,698	13.1	491	–	30%
2019LNG / alt.	not published	5,995	16,749	17,790	1,337	13.3	337	–	66%
2018LNG / alt.	not published	7,302	20,128	20,222	1,198	16.9	361	–	46%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	GasLog LNG Services Ltd.	–	–	–	–	ABS	B+C
2024LNG	GasLog LNG Services Ltd.	11.6	7.39	+57%	249 of 312	ABS	B+C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	11.2	9.10	+23%	247 of 355	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	24.0	10.4	+131%	336 of 379	ABS	B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	23.4	10.9	+115%	226 of 248	ABS	B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	19.0	10.9	+74%	179 of 197	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.