Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC TOMOKO

IMO: 9309461
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 64,338 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.00 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL · part of MSC Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 82,335 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

268

Container median 174 kg/nm (+54%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−46%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

94.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,363 t

CO₂ emitted

51,074 t

Distance sailed

60,995 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,158 h

173 days, 47% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 263 kg/nm · median 177 (+48%)

78.8Ranks 1,755 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 13.3 (+7%)

9.1Faster than 64% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−22%)

7.22Ranks 843 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports11%
From the EU53%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,155 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC TOMOKO
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC TOMOKO
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC TOMOKO
Container median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−3%	−2%	+48%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.3 kn	+16%	+29%	+3%	+13%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−14%	−17%	−4%	−18%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−4.6 kn	−12%	−36%	−16%	+6%	4.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.6 kn	+15%	+35%	+2%	+17%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+1%	+3%	−19%	+15%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	+1.5 kn	−8%	+3%	+27%	−12%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	16,369	51,202	62,321	4,384	14.2	263	12.8	–
2024	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	11,475	35,839	42,210	3,027	13.9	272	13.6	–
2023	not published	9,553	30,146	40,821	3,237	12.6	234	12.0	–
2022	not published	11,559	36,548	42,380	3,271	13.0	273	14.6	–
2021	not published	15,769	49,741	50,613	2,875	17.6	312	13.7	–
2020	not published	13,448	42,393	49,668	3,320	15.0	271	11.7	–
2019	not published	16,363	51,074	60,995	4,158	14.7	268	10.2	–
2018	not published	13,902	43,392	47,904	3,640	13.2	290	11.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	12.8	16.3	−22%	843 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	13.6	17.5	−22%	726 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	12.0	19.4	−38%	534 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	14.6	19.1	−24%	668 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	13.7	17.9	−23%	611 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	11.7	17.6	−33%	491 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	10.2	18.9	−46%	338 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	11.6	20.2	−43%	356 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.