Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

LNG ONDO

IMO: 9311579
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bermuda
Port of registry: Hamilton
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.31 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BW Fleet Management AS · part of BW Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

278

LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (−10%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

9.51

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (−13%)

Average speed

15.1 kn

LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

101.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,303 t

CO₂ emitted

40,691 t

Distance sailed

51,412 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,394 h

141 days, 39% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 329 kg/nm · median 190 (+73%)

152Ranks 356 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 8.8 kn · median 14.4 (−39%)

11.2Faster than 4% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 17.3 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+143%)

5.06Ranks 353 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU42%
Into the EU57%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

659 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LNG ONDO
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LNG ONDO
LNG carrier median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

LNG ONDO
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.9 kn	+22%	+11%	+210%	+90%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.4 kn	+22%	−2%	−67%	+4%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−16%	−16%	+139%	−25%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.3 kn	+4%	−6%	−57%	+18%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−3%	+1%	−50%	−8%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.2 kn	−7%	−21%	+68%	+13%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.6 kn	+10%	+23%	+98%	−15%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	BW Fleet Management AS	14,786	41,054	44,947	5,083	8.8	329	–	–
2024LNG	BW Fleet Management A/S	3,898	10,753	14,498	1,492	9.7	269	–	–
2023LNG / alt.	not published	9,698	26,700	44,006	3,649	12.1	220	–	–
2022LNG / alt.	not published	4,807	13,236	18,410	1,517	12.1	261	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	10,844	29,859	43,267	3,223	13.4	251	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	22,280	61,478	86,358	6,708	12.9	258	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	14,303	40,691	51,412	3,394	15.1	278	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	6,602	18,657	25,989	1,930	13.5	254	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	BW Fleet Management AS	17.3	7.12	+143%	353 of 386	DNV	B+C
2024LNG	BW Fleet Management A/S	9.10	7.39	+23%	201 of 312	DNV	C
2023LNG / alt.	not published	8.78	9.10	−4%	168 of 355	DNV	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	11.7	10.4	+12%	228 of 379	DNV	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	9.91	10.5	−5%	133 of 289	DNV	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	10.8	10.7	+1%	137 of 267	DNV	C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	9.51	10.9	−13%	81 of 248	DNV	C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	11.2	10.9	+3%	108 of 197	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.