Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK SELETAR

IMO: 9315197
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 60,022 t
Flag (estimated): United States
Port of registry: Norfolk
Technical efficiency: EEDI 16.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk Line, Limited-USA · part of Maersk

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 59,063 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

225

Container median 172 kg/nm (+30%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−33%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

85.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,057 t

CO₂ emitted

40,672 t

Distance sailed

58,160 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,661 h

153 days, 42% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 222 kg/nm · median 177 (+25%)

78.8Ranks 1,415 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.3 kn · median 13.3 (+23%)

9.1Faster than 93% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−29%)

7.22Ranks 742 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU42%
Into the EU56%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

13,057 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

273 t

0.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAERSK SELETAR
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAERSK SELETAR
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAERSK SELETAR
Container median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.2 kn	−4%	−11%	−90%	+3%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.2 kn	+10%	+18%	+25%	+11%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−11%	−15%	+15%	−9%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−4%	−5%	−12%	−7%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+1.4 kn	+10%	+20%	+3%	−0%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−5%	−8%	+4%	+8%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	−6%	−12%	−27%	−23%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk Line, Limited-USA	1,736	5,409	7,823	479	16.3	222	11.5	100%
2024	Maersk Line Ltd-USA	17,473	54,416	75,325	4,305	17.5	232	11.1	100%
2023	not published	12,765	39,756	60,382	3,699	16.3	211	10.0	100%
2022	not published	12,482	38,879	52,471	3,080	17.0	238	11.0	100%
2021	not published	14,748	45,934	59,629	3,443	17.3	247	11.8	–
2020	not published	13,057	40,672	58,160	3,661	15.9	225	11.8	100%
2019	not published	13,256	41,351	55,872	3,405	16.4	237	11.0	100%
2018	not published	19,246	60,161	76,210	4,331	17.6	253	14.3	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk Line, Limited-USA	11.5	16.3	−29%	742 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk Line Ltd-USA	11.1	17.5	−36%	535 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	10.0	19.4	−48%	385 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	11.0	19.1	−42%	403 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	11.8	17.9	−34%	452 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	11.8	17.6	−33%	498 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	11.0	18.9	−42%	399 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	14.3	20.2	−29%	506 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.