Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

ANTWERPEN

IMO: 9318321
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 9,202 t
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.19 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd · part of Anglo-Eastern

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,202 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

93.2 kg/nm

Gas carrier (LPG) median 80.4 kg/nm (+16%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

32.42

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.82 (−9%)

Average speed

12.7 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.5 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,174 t

CO₂ emitted

13,358 t

13,563 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

44,777 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,534 h

147 days, 40% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2024

Set against all 306 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 93.2 kg/nm · median 80.4 (+16%)

51.6Ranks 207 of 306, lowest first125.8

Average speedThis ship 12.7 kn · median 12.5 (+2%)

9.3Faster than 54% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 32.42 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.82 (−9%)

15.04Ranks 142 of 306, lowest first115.00

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports59%
From the EU15%
Into the EU14%
At berth in the EU12%

85% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (11,415 t).

Fuel burned laden

88%

12% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

12.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ANTWERPEN
Gas carrier (LPG) median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

ANTWERPEN
Gas carrier (LPG) median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ANTWERPEN
Gas carrier (LPG) median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−19%	−19%	+1%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.5 kn	+6%	−5%	−24%	+2%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+4%	+4%	+0%	+13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+2.4 kn	−11%	+7%	+19%	−13%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	+7%	+20%	−30%	−7%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.3 kn	−6%	−28%	+24%	−11%	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	3,082	9,818	33,605	2,711	12.4	91.7	20.77	91%
2024	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	4,174	13,358	44,777	3,534	12.7	93.2	32.42	88%
2023	not published	5,104	16,356	44,190	3,514	12.6	115.5	38.89	88%
2022	not published	6,344	20,252	58,365	4,151	14.1	108.7	38.28	50%
2021	not published	6,048	19,322	58,090	4,109	14.1	104.1	33.94	52%
2020	not published	5,706	18,271	48,631	4,147	11.7	117.3	39.07	86%
2019	not published	7,573	23,989	69,005	6,620	10.4	109.8	42.11	53%
2018	not published	6,498	20,644	55,485	4,058	13.7	117.1	47.23	62%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	–	–	–	–	ABS	B+C
2024	Anglo Eastern Ship Management Pte. Ltd	32.42	35.82	−9%	142 of 306	ABS	B+C
2023	not published	38.89	41.77	−7%	155 of 330	ABS	B+C
2022	not published	38.28	42.53	−10%	161 of 348	ABS	B+C
2021	not published	33.94	46.91	−28%	112 of 323	ABS	B+C
2020	not published	39.07	42.29	−8%	159 of 339	ABS	B+C
2019	not published	42.11	45.85	−8%	158 of 331	ABS	B+C
2018	not published	47.23	53.11	−11%	137 of 297	ABS	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.