Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

OSAKA EXPRESS

IMO
9320697
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
79,152 t
Flag (estimated)
Liberia
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EEXI 9.39 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Hapag-Lloyd AG

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 70,816 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
237
Container median 186 kg/nm (+28%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
10.5
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−41%)
Average speed
14.2 kn
Container median 14.1 kn (+1%)
Fuel per day at sea
80.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
5,065 t
CO₂ emitted
15,942 t
Distance sailed
21,379 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,509 h
63 days, 17% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 249 kg/nm · median 177 (+41%)
78.8Ranks 1,638 of 2,208, lowest first302
Average speedThis ship 16.7 kn · median 13.3 (+26%)
9.1Faster than 96% of container ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.81 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−40%)
7.22Ranks 550 of 2,208, lowest first46.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports4%
  • From the EU52%
  • Into the EU42%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
512 t
3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • OSAKA EXPRESS
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • OSAKA EXPRESS
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • OSAKA EXPRESS
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+1.3 kn+11%+21%−72%+11%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024+2.8 kn−2%+20%+242%−15%2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−0.3 kn−5%−7%+24%−10%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022−1.3 kn+2%−7%−17%+9%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Hapag-Lloyd AG5,18416,17220,8271,24616.72499.81–
2024HL Crewmanagement GmbH16,77652,44874,8984,87115.42248.82–
2023not published5,01815,07021,9051,73912.622910.4–
2022not published4,26013,05217,6631,37012.924111.5–
2021not published5,06515,94221,3791,50914.223710.5–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2025Hapag-Lloyd AG9.8116.3−40%550 of 2,208DNVB+C
2024HL Crewmanagement GmbH8.8217.5−50%359 of 1,974DNVB
2023not published10.419.4−46%418 of 1,899EnvServiceB
2022not published11.519.1−40%443 of 1,825DNVB
2021not published10.517.9−41%367 of 1,781DNVB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.