Navalyze · Container · Ship

ELEONORA MAERSK

IMO: 9321500
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 111,891 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.31 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 111,891 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

330.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+87%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.15

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−44%)

Average speed

16.0 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+20%)

Fuel per day at sea

127.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

25,623 t

CO₂ emitted

79,329 t

80,587 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

77,484 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,831 h

201 days, 55% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 330.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+87%)

78.8Ranks 2,111 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 13.3 (+20%)

9.1Faster than 90% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.15 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−44%)

7.22Ranks 477 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU51%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU1%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (40,185 t).

Fuel burned laden

99%

1% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

1.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ELEONORA MAERSK
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ELEONORA MAERSK
Container median

0.05.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ELEONORA MAERSK
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−1%	−2%	−14%	+19%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+3.4 kn	+8%	+37%	+485%	+4%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+8.9 kn	−15%	+179%	+112%	−41%	8.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−4.5 kn	−6%	−57%	−29%	+10%	4.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−4.1 kn	+24%	−16%	−33%	+23%	4.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.8 kn	+6%	−7%	−45%	+3%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	−17%	−14%	+27%	+3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	25,623	79,329	77,484	4,831	16.0	330.7	9.15	99%
2024	Maersk A/S	30,283	94,255	90,422	5,578	16.2	334.9	7.67	99%
2023	not published	4,783	14,895	15,447	1,211	12.8	309.6	7.34	97%
2022	not published	2,659	8,284	7,295	1,878	3.9	364.5	12.46	87%
2021	not published	3,971	12,369	10,288	1,219	8.4	385.9	11.35	–
2020	not published	4,762	14,828	15,335	1,224	12.5	310.5	9.21	100%
2019	not published	8,157	25,404	27,912	1,958	14.3	292.2	8.94	100%
2018	not published	7,681	24,008	21,920	1,585	13.8	350.4	8.72	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	9.15	16.30	−44%	477 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	7.67	17.52	−56%	235 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	7.34	19.40	−62%	192 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	12.46	19.13	−35%	515 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	11.35	17.90	−37%	424 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	9.21	17.58	−48%	318 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	8.94	18.88	−53%	257 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	8.72	20.22	−57%	179 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.