Navalyze · Container · Ship

EVELYN MAERSK

IMO: 9321512
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 114,863 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EIV 12.13 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 152,937 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

350

Container median 182 kg/nm (+92%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.14

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−65%)

Average speed

17.2 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+25%)

Fuel per day at sea

144.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,323 t

CO₂ emitted

44,697 t

Distance sailed

40,932 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,377 h

99 days, 27% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 310 kg/nm · median 177 (+75%)

78.8Ranks 2,023 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.8 kn · median 13.3 (+26%)

9.1Faster than 97% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.41 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−48%)

7.22Ranks 397 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU11%
Into the EU79%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

14,323 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,033 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EVELYN MAERSK
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EVELYN MAERSK
Container median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EVELYN MAERSK
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	−21%	−19%	+147%	−22%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+3.5 kn	+15%	+47%	+133%	+2%	3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+4.4 kn	+6%	+61%	−8%	−2%	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	−7%	+3%	+36%	+1%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−5.2 kn	+12%	−33%	−31%	+8%	5.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.2 kn	−6%	+13%	−9%	−19%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−6.6 kn	−6%	−42%	−56%	+72%	6.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	25,213	78,589	81,355	4,856	16.8	310	8.41	99%
2024	Maersk A/S	12,923	40,220	32,962	2,019	16.3	392	10.8	99%
2023	not published	4,815	14,997	14,163	1,103	12.8	340	10.6	96%
2022	not published	4,930	15,368	15,342	1,824	8.4	321	10.8	92%
2021	not published	3,893	12,126	11,305	1,485	7.6	344	10.7	–
2020	not published	5,025	15,675	16,289	1,276	12.8	309	9.92	100%
2019	not published	5,874	18,300	17,928	1,684	10.6	328	12.3	100%
2018	not published	14,323	44,697	40,932	2,377	17.2	350	7.14	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	8.41	16.3	−48%	397 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	10.8	17.5	−38%	503 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	10.6	19.4	−46%	429 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	10.8	19.1	−43%	385 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	10.7	17.9	−40%	378 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	9.92	17.6	−44%	367 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	12.3	18.9	−35%	465 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	7.14	20.2	−65%	70 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.