Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

PIGEON POINT

IMO: 9322396
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 24,523 t
Flag (estimated): Isle of Man (from the 2024 report)
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.50 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL Tankship Management Pte. Ltd. · part of MOL

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 14,513 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

111

Chemical tanker median 81.9 kg/nm (+35%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

24.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+49%)

Average speed

13.0 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

34.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,516 t

CO₂ emitted

4,793 t

Distance sailed

13,669 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,048 h

44 days, 12% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 110 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+38%)

52.8Ranks 1,299 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 8.0 kn · median 11.1 (−28%)

8.8Faster than 7% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−6%)

7.93Ranks 672 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU59%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

225 t

4.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PIGEON POINT
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PIGEON POINT
Chemical tanker median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PIGEON POINT
Chemical tanker median

10.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.6 kn	+2%	−23%	−59%	–	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.4 kn	−3%	−21%	+208%	–	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2023	+0.4 kn	+21%	+24%	+10%	+64%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	+1%	−2%	−64%	−6%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	−8%	−6%	+226%	−9%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−9%	−8%	−74%	−40%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MOL Tankship Management Pte. Ltd.	1,888	5,982	17,203	2,160	8.0	110	14.2	–
2024	MOL Tankship Management Pte. Ltd.	4,532	14,339	42,128	3,967	10.6	108	–	–
2023	not published	1,516	4,793	13,669	1,048	13.0	111	24.2	–
2021	not published	1,147	3,625	12,459	985	12.6	92.0	14.7	–
2020	not published	3,150	9,960	34,544	2,653	13.0	91.2	15.7	–
2019	not published	1,056	3,319	10,604	834	12.7	99.6	17.2	–
2018	not published	4,449	13,942	40,576	3,227	12.6	110	28.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MOL Tankship Management Pte. Ltd.	14.2	15.0	−6%	672 of 1,460	ClassNK	B+C
2024	MOL Tankship Management Pte. Ltd.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2023	not published	24.2	16.2	+49%	913 of 1,314	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	14.7	16.7	−12%	543 of 1,343	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	15.7	16.2	−3%	619 of 1,312	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	17.2	17.3	−1%	649 of 1,321	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	28.6	17.1	+67%	1,005 of 1,294	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.