Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

ASPENDOS SEAWAYS

IMO: 9322425
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 4,604 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: UN PENDIK

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S. · part of DFDS

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,746 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

119

Ro-ro median 107 kg/nm (+11%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

78.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 90.9 (−14%)

Average speed

18.4 kn

Ro-ro median 14.8 kn (+24%)

Fuel per day at sea

52.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,855 t

CO₂ emitted

43,177 t

Distance sailed

116,140 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,298 h

262 days, 72% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 116 kg/nm · median 105 (+11%)

56.6Ranks 148 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 18.1 kn · median 14.4 (+26%)

10.9Faster than 99% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 78.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (−17%)

47.4Ranks 82 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports22%
From the EU44%
Into the EU33%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

592 t

1.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ASPENDOS SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

100.0105.0110.0115.0120.0125.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ASPENDOS SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

14.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ASPENDOS SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

60.080.0100120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	+1%	+6%	−6%	+6%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	−3%	−6%	−1%	−1%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	−1%	+1%	+13%	+10%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.0 kn	−3%	−8%	−17%	−11%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+4%	+4%	+30%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−1%	−1%	−16%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+2%	−1%	−6%	−3%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	12,866	40,087	110,808	6,133	18.1	116	78.6	–
2024	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	13,564	42,262	117,800	6,844	17.2	115	74.3	–
2023	not published	14,036	43,728	118,800	6,691	17.8	118	75.3	–
2022	not published	12,595	39,242	105,392	6,066	17.4	120	68.4	–
2021	not published	15,604	48,606	127,160	6,895	18.4	123	76.7	–
2020	not published	11,465	35,783	97,499	5,275	18.5	118	72.5	–
2019	not published	13,855	43,177	116,140	6,298	18.4	119	78.3	–
2018	not published	14,473	45,082	124,106	6,548	19.0	117	80.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	78.6	95.2	−17%	82 of 235	DNV	B
2024	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	74.3	97.5	−24%	66 of 220	DNV	A
2023	not published	75.3	109	−31%	64 of 221	DNV	A
2022	not published	68.4	90.6	−25%	63 of 223	DNV	A
2021	not published	76.7	104	−26%	72 of 219	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	72.5	103	−30%	65 of 238	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	78.3	90.9	−14%	94 of 271	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	80.9	91.0	−11%	99 of 260	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.