Navalyze · Container · Ship

HMM BANGKOK

IMO: 9323510
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 62,495 t
Port of registry: Jeju
Technical efficiency: EIV 28.08 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HYUNDAI BANGKOK

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: HMM Company Limited · part of HMM

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 62,495 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

222.4 kg/nm

Container median 167.2 kg/nm (+33%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.04

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.52 (−37%)

Average speed

13.5 kn

Container median 13.5 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

72.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,676 t

CO₂ emitted

33,114 t

33,639 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

47,996 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,543 h

148 days, 40% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 222.4 kg/nm · median 167.2 (+33%)

78.9Ranks 1,293 of 1,974, lowest first301.6

Average speedThis ship 13.5 kn · median 13.5 (+0%)

9.6Faster than 50% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.04 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.52 (−37%)

7.33Ranks 525 of 1,974, lowest first51.62

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU47%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU1%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (17,464 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

HMM BANGKOK
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’192019’242024

Average speed, kn

HMM BANGKOK
Container median

13.513.814.014.314.5

’192019’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HMM BANGKOK
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

’192019’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2019→2024	−0.9 kn	+5%	−1%	+171%	−32%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	HMM Company Limited	10,676	33,114	47,996	3,543	13.5	222.4	11.04	–
2019	not published	3,752	11,696	17,738	1,228	14.4	211.5	16.30	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	HMM Company Limited	11.04	17.52	−37%	525 of 1,974	Korean Register	C
2019	not published	16.30	18.88	−14%	735 of 1,788	Korean Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.