Navalyze · Container · Ship

ELI A

IMO: 9326976
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,801 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.14 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ANGELA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,491 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

70.4

Container median 174 kg/nm (−60%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

49.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+159%)

Average speed

8.3 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−39%)

Fuel per day at sea

14.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,393 t

CO₂ emitted

7,474 t

Distance sailed

33,971 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,110 h

171 days, 47% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 78.4 kg/nm · median 177 (−56%)

78.8Ranks 219 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 13.3 (−16%)

9.1Faster than 23% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+160%)

7.22Ranks 1,919 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports38%
From the EU31%
Into the EU28%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

259 t

3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ELI A
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ELI A
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ELI A
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	+7%	+12%	−7%	−5%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−2%	−1%	+68%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.7 kn	−0%	−14%	−2%	+19%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.6 kn	+8%	+24%	−22%	−2%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.9 kn	−5%	−25%	−26%	−9%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+5.2 kn	+5%	+70%	+100%	−6%	5.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.6 kn	−17%	−47%	+0%	−9%	4.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	4,691	14,679	59,805	5,351	11.2	78.4	42.3	–
2024part-year	Dohle Shipmanagement Limited	2,928	9,138	39,690	3,745	10.6	73.8	46.5	–
2024	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	4,697	14,651	64,078	5,991	10.7	73.3	44.7	–
2023	not published	2,862	9,001	38,177	3,633	10.5	75.0	48.8	–
2022	not published	2,942	9,344	39,116	3,212	12.2	75.2	40.9	–
2021	not published	3,513	11,221	50,420	4,744	10.6	69.7	42.0	–
2020	not published	5,000	15,741	67,819	5,032	13.5	73.7	45.9	–
2019	not published	2,393	7,474	33,971	4,110	8.3	70.4	49.0	–
2018	not published	2,892	9,014	33,938	2,632	12.9	85.2	53.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	42.3	16.3	+160%	1,919 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024part-year	Dohle Shipmanagement Limited	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2024	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	44.7	17.5	+155%	1,682 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	48.8	19.4	+152%	1,662 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	40.9	19.1	+114%	1,495 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	42.0	17.9	+135%	1,507 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	45.9	17.6	+161%	1,560 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	49.0	18.9	+159%	1,531 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	53.6	20.2	+165%	1,528 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.