Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SIDER AMY

IMO
9331505
Type
General cargo ship
Port of registry
Douglas
Technical efficiency
EEXI 8.67 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Nova Ship Tech SA

?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
–
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
–
g CO₂/dwt·nm
Average speed
–
Fuel per day at sea
–
Fuel consumed
0 t
CO₂ emitted
0 t
0 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
–
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
0 h
0 days, 0% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,167 general cargo ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 53.8 kg/nm · median 55.1 (−2%)
36.0Ranks 559 of 1,167, lowest first90.9
Average speedThis ship 9.3 kn · median 10.7 (−13%)
8.2Faster than 24% of general cargo ships12.9
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 18.12 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 24.50 (−26%)
11.30Ranks 280 of 1,167, lowest first48.87
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

The voyage split is not in this year's report.

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
–
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.0 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • SIDER AMY
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • SIDER AMY
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • SIDER AMY
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025–––––
2020→2024–––––
2019→2020−0.2 kn−8%−10%+39%−41%Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019−1.0 kn+4%−6%−39%+77%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Nova Ship Tech SA00–0––––
2024Nova Ship Tech SA00–0––––
2020not published1,4214,49926,4082,8399.353.820.32–
2019not published1,1133,48519,0592,0139.558.422.45–
2018not published1,7505,48531,1792,95610.556.122.57–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2025Nova Ship Tech SA––––RINAB
2024Nova Ship Tech SA––––RINAB
2020not published18.1224.50−26%280 of 1,167RINAB
2019not published30.6624.96+23%757 of 1,154RINAB
2018not published17.3424.89−30%245 of 1,044RINAB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

SIDER AMY (IMO 9331505): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze