Navalyze · Container · Ship

ANDREA

IMO: 9333357
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,678 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.29 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Myklebusthaug Management AS

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,047 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

78.4

Container median 178 kg/nm (−56%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

41.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+115%)

Average speed

12.5 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,829 t

CO₂ emitted

12,126 t

Distance sailed

48,814 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,906 h

163 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 86.3 kg/nm · median 177 (−51%)

78.8Ranks 349 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 13.3 (−16%)

9.1Faster than 23% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 47.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+193%)

7.22Ranks 1,998 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports89%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU11%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,371 t

11.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ANDREA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ANDREA
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ANDREA
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	+6%	+14%	−12%	+1%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.3 kn	+16%	+3%	−9%	−16%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	−10%	−17%	+14%	+37%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	+5%	−4%	−10%	+1%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.9 kn	−11%	+13%	+8%	−9%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.0 kn	+10%	+34%	−9%	−11%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	−19%	−5%	+40%	−7%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Myklebusthaug Management AS	3,801	11,937	44,048	3,950	11.2	86.3	47.7	–
2024	Myklebusthaug Management AS	4,099	12,801	50,243	4,872	10.3	81.6	47.4	–
2023	not published	3,916	12,300	55,493	4,797	11.6	70.6	56.2	–
2022	not published	3,829	12,126	48,814	3,906	12.5	78.4	41.1	–
2021	not published	4,047	12,864	54,431	3,964	13.7	74.4	40.5	–
2020	not published	4,204	13,138	50,441	4,674	10.8	83.3	44.5	–
2019	not published	4,188	13,158	55,234	6,243	8.8	75.8	49.9	–
2018	not published	3,716	11,774	39,555	5,287	7.5	94.0	53.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Myklebusthaug Management AS	47.7	16.3	+193%	1,998 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	Myklebusthaug Management AS	47.4	17.5	+170%	1,723 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	56.2	19.4	+190%	1,751 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	41.1	19.1	+115%	1,497 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	40.5	17.9	+126%	1,491 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	44.5	17.6	+153%	1,538 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	49.9	18.9	+165%	1,547 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	53.8	20.2	+166%	1,531 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.