Navalyze · Container · Ship

MOL EXPERIENCE

IMO: 9333838
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 37,138 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 37,138 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

197.7 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.80

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+3%)

Average speed

6.5 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−51%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

852 t

CO₂ emitted

2,690 t

2,732 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

4,312 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

661 h

28 days, 8% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 197.7 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+12%)

78.8Ranks 1,256 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 6.5 kn · median 13.3 (−51%)

9.1Faster than 3% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.80 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+3%)

7.22Ranks 1,139 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU69%
Into the EU3%
At berth in the EU3%

64% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,722 t).

Fuel burned laden

97%

3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

2.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MOL EXPERIENCE
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MOL EXPERIENCE
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MOL EXPERIENCE
Container median

16.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−4.0 kn	+12%	−30%	−74%	–	4.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−2.4 kn	+8%	−12%	−17%	–	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	−16%	−20%	+15%	−19%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	−8%	−9%	+34%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	+12%	+7%	−64%	−1%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	+3%	+2%	−21%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	−3%	−7%	−1%	−11%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	852	2,690	4,312	661	6.5	197.7	16.80	97%
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	2,884	9,118	16,395	1,559	10.5	175.9	–	97%
2023	not published	3,230	10,271	19,816	1,533	12.9	163.0	16.06	96%
2022	not published	3,326	10,576	17,221	1,262	13.7	193.1	19.80	92%
2021	not published	2,692	8,556	12,841	927	13.9	209.6	18.78	96%
2020	not published	6,645	21,075	35,558	2,450	14.5	186.9	18.97	97%
2019	not published	8,179	25,706	45,148	3,068	14.7	181.2	18.57	98%
2018	not published	8,516	26,761	45,801	2,967	15.4	185.9	20.80	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	16.80	16.30	+3%	1,139 of 2,208	ClassNK	C
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	16.06	19.40	−17%	788 of 1,899	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	19.80	19.13	+4%	927 of 1,825	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	18.78	17.90	+5%	928 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	18.97	17.58	+8%	970 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	18.57	18.88	−2%	874 of 1,788	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	20.80	20.22	+3%	885 of 1,705	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.