Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM ALCAZAR

IMO: 9335197
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 37,997 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.02 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 40,309 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

211

Container median 186 kg/nm (+13%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−9%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

74.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,363 t

CO₂ emitted

48,089 t

Distance sailed

72,922 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,974 h

207 days, 57% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 162 kg/nm · median 177 (−9%)

78.8Ranks 1,009 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)

9.1Faster than 25% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−18%)

7.22Ranks 881 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports43%
From the EU19%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,755 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM ALCAZAR
Container median

140.0160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM ALCAZAR
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM ALCAZAR
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−3%	−5%	+8%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−1.5 kn	+6%	−6%	+13%	−22%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	−29%	−34%	+54%	−5%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 29%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+6%	+1%	−58%	+5%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+15%	+19%	+124%	−3%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−1.7 kn	−19%	−27%	−52%	−0%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 19%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.6 kn	+10%	+23%	−14%	+2%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	9,417	29,393	58,163	5,100	11.4	162	13.3	–
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	9,033	28,267	53,983	4,652	11.6	167	12.6	–
2023	not published	7,518	23,554	47,598	3,641	13.1	158	16.3	–
2022	not published	6,888	21,647	30,891	2,213	14.0	223	17.2	–
2021	not published	15,363	48,089	72,922	4,974	14.7	211	16.4	–
2020	not published	5,972	18,689	32,530	2,304	14.1	184	16.9	–
2019	not published	15,211	47,529	67,430	4,264	15.8	226	17.0	–
2018	not published	16,028	50,098	78,026	5,513	14.2	205	16.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	13.3	16.3	−18%	881 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	12.6	17.5	−28%	649 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	16.3	19.4	−16%	796 of 1,899	RINA	A
2022	not published	17.2	19.1	−10%	827 of 1,825	RINA	A
2021	not published	16.4	17.9	−9%	809 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	16.9	17.6	−4%	850 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	17.0	18.9	−10%	787 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	16.6	20.2	−18%	655 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.