Navalyze · Container · Ship

GSL CHATEAU D'IF

IMO: 9335202
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 35,614 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valleta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CMA CGM CHATEAU D' IF

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 40,671 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

203

Container median 182 kg/nm (+12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−23%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

76.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,527 t

CO₂ emitted

54,750 t

Distance sailed

86,348 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,472 h

228 days, 62% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 167 kg/nm · median 177 (−6%)

78.8Ranks 1,047 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 13.3 (−18%)

9.1Faster than 21% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−10%)

7.22Ranks 983 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU44%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

821 t

1.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

GSL CHATEAU D'IF
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GSL CHATEAU D'IF
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GSL CHATEAU D'IF
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.2 kn	−1%	−17%	−10%	+8%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+4%	+7%	+24%	−15%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	−21%	−28%	+18%	+2%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	+2%	−7%	−27%	−12%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.7 kn	+17%	+42%	−16%	+24%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.6 kn	−17%	−26%	−11%	−11%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−1.6 kn	+2%	−9%	−15%	+2%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	8,747	27,241	52,318	4,792	10.9	167	14.6	–
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	9,862	30,762	58,351	4,463	13.1	169	13.5	–
2023	not published	7,590	23,709	46,923	3,689	12.7	162	15.9	–
2022	not published	8,162	25,545	39,801	2,861	13.9	205	15.6	–
2021	not published	10,925	34,106	54,465	3,568	15.3	201	17.7	–
2020	not published	11,198	34,990	65,216	5,188	12.6	172	14.2	–
2019	not published	15,126	47,251	73,385	5,173	14.2	206	16.0	–
2018	not published	17,527	54,750	86,348	5,472	15.8	203	15.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	14.6	16.3	−10%	983 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	TECHNOMAR SHIPPING INC-LIB	13.5	17.5	−23%	717 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	15.9	19.4	−18%	777 of 1,899	RINA	A
2022	not published	15.6	19.1	−19%	743 of 1,825	RINA	A
2021	not published	17.7	17.9	−1%	885 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	14.2	17.6	−19%	686 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	16.0	18.9	−15%	722 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	15.6	20.2	−23%	585 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.