Navalyze · Container · Ship

NYK DAEDALUS

IMO: 9337614
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 37,012 t
Flag (estimated): Cayman Islands
Port of registry: George Town
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.30 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD · part of NYK

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 30,567 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

159

Container median 165 kg/nm (−3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−15%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−2%)

Fuel per day at sea

49.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,087 t

CO₂ emitted

16,140 t

Distance sailed

31,905 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,471 h

103 days, 28% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 181 kg/nm · median 177 (+2%)

78.8Ranks 1,137 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.1 kn · median 13.3 (−9%)

9.1Faster than 31% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−6%)

7.22Ranks 1,036 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU66%
Into the EU16%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

949 t

5.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NYK DAEDALUS
Container median

150.0160.0170.0180.0190.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NYK DAEDALUS
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NYK DAEDALUS
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+2.5 kn	+5%	+32%	−70%	–	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−3.3 kn	+8%	−20%	−46%	–	3.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.8 kn	−3%	−15%	−59%	+21%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	−15%	−19%	+247%	−22%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+14%	+14%	−29%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−7%	−10%	−15%	−13%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−6%	−9%	−10%	+1%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	918	2,877	5,081	421	12.1	181	15.3	–
2025	ONESEA SOLUTIONS PTE LTD	918	2,877	5,081	421	12.1	181	15.3	–
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	2,952	9,366	17,103	1,784	9.6	173	–	–
2023	not published	5,087	16,140	31,905	2,471	12.9	159	16.6	–
2022	not published	12,774	40,385	78,032	5,307	14.7	164	13.6	–
2021	not published	4,353	13,809	22,518	1,454	15.5	193	17.5	–
2020	not published	5,423	17,189	31,849	2,072	15.4	170	17.5	–
2019	not published	6,817	21,435	37,371	2,345	15.9	182	20.0	–
2018	not published	8,124	25,528	41,728	2,554	16.3	195	19.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2025	ONESEA SOLUTIONS PTE LTD	15.3	16.3	−6%	1,036 of 2,208	ClassNK	B+C
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	16.6	19.4	−15%	805 of 1,899	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	13.6	19.1	−29%	611 of 1,825	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	17.5	17.9	−2%	869 of 1,781	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	17.5	17.6	−0%	893 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	20.0	18.9	+6%	960 of 1,788	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	19.9	20.2	−2%	830 of 1,705	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.