Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

SIDER BILBAO

IMO: 9338151
Type: General cargo ship
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EIV 13.04 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Technical Core Management Srl

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

59.7 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+69%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

30.42

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (+20%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

14.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,829 t

CO₂ emitted

5,809 t

5,898 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

30,620 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,045 h

127 days, 35% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 59.7 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+69%)

17.4Ranks 2,038 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.1 kn · median 9.3 (+9%)

7.0Faster than 65% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 30.42 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (+20%)

10.14Ranks 1,789 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports39%
From the EU24%
Into the EU27%
At berth in the EU10%

71% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,125 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

9.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SIDER BILBAO
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SIDER BILBAO
General cargo median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

SIDER BILBAO
General cargo median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−9%	−7%	+2%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	+9%	+2%	+376%	−62%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	−0%	−8%	−72%	+296%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.7 kn	−13%	+15%	−23%	−17%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.7 kn	+22%	−15%	+162%	+3%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.3 kn	+2%	+14%	−68%	+7%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	+4%	+13%	+107%	+25%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Technical Core Management Srl	1,829	5,809	30,620	3,045	10.1	59.7	–	–
2024	Technical Core Management Srl	1,961	6,155	29,955	3,032	9.9	65.5	28.76	–
2023	not published	377	1,182	6,294	596	10.6	59.9	78.10	–
2022	not published	1,334	4,219	22,212	1,945	11.4	60.0	20.58	–
2021	not published	1,996	6,313	29,017	3,340	8.7	68.8	23.19	–
2020	not published	627	1,989	11,095	896	12.4	56.5	24.26	–
2019	not published	1,954	6,149	35,171	3,172	11.1	55.5	21.81	–
2018	not published	909	2,856	17,017	1,662	10.2	53.4	18.16	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Technical Core Management Srl	30.42	25.45	+20%	1,789 of 2,706	RINA	B
2024	Technical Core Management Srl	28.76	19.25	+49%	874 of 1,111	RINA	B
2023	not published	74.95	20.67	+263%	1,028 of 1,045	RINA	B
2022	not published	18.92	21.57	−12%	395 of 1,034	RINA	B
2021	not published	22.76	22.70	+0%	577 of 1,142	RINA	B
2020	not published	22.14	24.50	−10%	468 of 1,167	RINA	B
2019	not published	20.64	24.96	−17%	377 of 1,154	RINA	B
2018	not published	16.50	24.89	−34%	227 of 1,044	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.