Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

SUNRISE ACE

IMO: 9338840
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 5,617 t
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.92 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,617 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

89.5 kg/nm

Vehicle carrier median 99.9 kg/nm (−10%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

50.21

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 55.36 (−9%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

46 t

CO₂ emitted

146 t

149 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

519 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

35 h

1 days, 0% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 89.5 kg/nm · median 99.9 (−10%)

79.6Ranks 117 of 506, lowest first119.0

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 14.4 (+2%)

12.0Faster than 58% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 50.21 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.36 (−9%)

34.70Ranks 209 of 506, lowest first158.48

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU75%
Into the EU22%
At berth in the EU3%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (75 t).

Fuel burned laden

97%

3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

3.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.021

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SUNRISE ACE
Vehicle carrier median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SUNRISE ACE
Vehicle carrier median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SUNRISE ACE
Vehicle carrier median

40.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+2.7 kn	+22%	+49%	−0%	–	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−4.3 kn	−32%	−50%	−97%	–	4.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+4%	+4%	−50%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+1.4 kn	+12%	+23%	+18%	−44%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.8 kn	+2%	+8%	+34%	+30%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.0 kn	−4%	−10%	−40%	+44%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	−7%	−11%	−27%	−5%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	46	146	519	35	14.7	89.5	50.21	97%
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	38	120	520	43	12.0	73.2	–	97%
2023	not published	1,868	5,896	17,444	1,071	16.3	107.1	59.35	98%
2022	not published	3,581	11,306	34,690	2,128	16.3	103.2	55.24	97%
2021	not published	2,697	8,513	29,306	1,966	14.9	92.0	99.03	63%
2020	not published	1,979	6,254	21,870	1,554	14.1	90.5	76.37	97%
2019	not published	3,406	10,635	36,298	2,406	15.1	93.8	53.21	99%
2018	not published	5,038	15,756	49,688	3,184	15.6	101.4	56.26	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	50.21	55.36	−9%	209 of 506	ClassNK	C
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	59.35	56.64	+5%	226 of 417	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	55.24	57.66	−4%	216 of 463	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	99.03	59.57	+66%	391 of 459	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	76.37	57.26	+33%	328 of 449	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	53.21	58.95	−10%	158 of 426	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	56.26	62.35	−10%	149 of 434	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.