Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC CANDICE

IMO: 9339284
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 82,182 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.95 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL · part of MSC Group

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 60,447 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

306

Container median 174 kg/nm (+76%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−16%)

Average speed

16.9 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+23%)

Fuel per day at sea

124.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

21,547 t

CO₂ emitted

67,237 t

Distance sailed

70,312 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,160 h

173 days, 47% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 277 kg/nm · median 177 (+56%)

78.8Ranks 1,844 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.9 kn · median 13.3 (−11%)

9.1Faster than 29% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−35%)

7.22Ranks 631 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports30%
From the EU33%
Into the EU33%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,071 t

3.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC CANDICE
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC CANDICE
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC CANDICE
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−0%	−6%	−64%	−37%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	−0%	+9%	+5%	+5%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.2 kn	−11%	−26%	−19%	+21%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−2.6 kn	−6%	−21%	+91%	+4%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−0%	−4%	+145%	+12%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+10%	+10%	−85%	−28%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	+3%	+5%	+89%	+13%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	4,038	12,626	14,590	1,230	11.9	277	10.5	–
2024	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	11,209	34,985	40,455	3,199	12.6	277	16.8	–
2023	not published	10,726	33,569	38,696	3,332	11.6	277	16.1	–
2022	not published	14,934	46,638	47,680	3,453	13.8	313	13.3	–
2021	not published	8,358	26,061	25,001	1,521	16.4	334	12.8	–
2020	not published	3,434	10,701	10,225	600	17.0	336	11.4	–
2019	not published	21,547	67,237	70,312	4,160	16.9	306	15.8	–
2018	not published	11,137	34,736	37,288	2,258	16.5	299	14.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	10.5	16.3	−35%	631 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	16.8	17.5	−4%	944 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	16.1	19.4	−17%	792 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	13.3	19.1	−30%	580 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	12.8	17.9	−28%	527 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	11.4	17.6	−35%	465 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	15.8	18.9	−16%	708 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	14.0	20.2	−31%	493 of 1,705	DNV	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.