Navalyze · Container · Ship

BREMEN EXPRESS

IMO: 9343728
Type: Container ship
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.71 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HL Crewmanagement GmbH

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 52,663 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

204

Container median 174 kg/nm (+17%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−36%)

Average speed

14.0 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

68.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,386 t

CO₂ emitted

29,349 t

Distance sailed

46,058 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,282 h

137 days, 37% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 224 kg/nm · median 167 (+34%)

78.9Ranks 1,303 of 1,974, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.2 kn · median 13.5 (−2%)

9.6Faster than 44% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 12.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.5 (−29%)

7.33Ranks 642 of 1,974, lowest first51.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports14%
From the EU44%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,109 t

3.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

BREMEN EXPRESS
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BREMEN EXPRESS
Container median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BREMEN EXPRESS
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	+19%	+26%	+16%	−14%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−2.2 kn	−18%	−30%	+4%	+13%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−4%	−7%	−10%	−2%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+1.1 kn	+13%	+21%	−12%	+9%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+3%	+4%	+59%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−13%	−12%	+610%	+6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	15,775	49,337	70,451	5,356	13.2	224	12.5	–
2023	not published	11,354	35,559	60,544	4,859	12.5	188	14.5	–
2022	not published	13,367	41,838	58,432	3,984	14.7	229	12.8	–
2021	not published	15,435	48,268	64,774	4,273	15.2	238	13.1	–
2020	not published	15,491	48,437	73,435	5,202	14.1	211	12.0	–
2019	not published	9,386	29,349	46,058	3,282	14.0	204	12.1	–
2018	not published	1,517	4,749	6,484	466	13.9	234	11.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	12.5	17.5	−29%	642 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	14.5	19.4	−25%	706 of 1,899	EnvService	B
2022	not published	12.8	19.1	−33%	537 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	13.1	17.9	−27%	556 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	12.0	17.6	−32%	512 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	12.1	18.9	−36%	456 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	11.4	20.2	−44%	346 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.