Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

HAKATA

IMO: 9346952
Type: Oil tanker
Flag (estimated): France
Port of registry: Marseille
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.19 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: CMB.TECH NV

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 293,664 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

260

Oil tanker median 138 kg/nm (+89%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

2.77

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.83 (−69%)

Average speed

9.4 kn

Oil tanker median 9.7 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

59.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,565 t

CO₂ emitted

17,389 t

Distance sailed

21,377 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,265 h

94 days, 26% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,870 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 223 kg/nm · median 134 (+66%)

81.5Ranks 1,752 of 1,870, lowest first204

Average speedThis ship 12.7 kn · median 11.0 (+15%)

8.1Faster than 95% of oil tanker ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 4.93 g CO₂/t·nm · median 9.03 (−45%)

4.81Ranks 202 of 1,870, lowest first26.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU65%
Into the EU28%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

516 t

3.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HAKATA
Oil tanker median

100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0

’192019’202020’242024

Average speed, kn

HAKATA
Oil tanker median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’192019’202020’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HAKATA
Oil tanker median

2.04.06.08.010.0

’192019’202020

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2020→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2019→2020	+3.3 kn	−14%	+15%	+52%	+78%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	CMB.TECH NV	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2020	not published	7,218	22,603	32,417	2,546	12.7	223	4.93	–
2019	not published	5,565	17,389	21,377	2,265	9.4	260	2.77	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	CMB.TECH NV	–	–	–	–	EMICERT	A
2020	not published	4.93	9.03	−45%	202 of 1,870	EMICERT	A
2019	not published	2.77	8.83	−69%	67 of 1,919	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.