Navalyze · Container · Ship

JAZAN

IMO: 9349540
Type: Container ship
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.55 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Marlow Ship Management Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG · part of Marlow

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 38,536 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

244

Container median 182 kg/nm (+34%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−2%)

Average speed

14.8 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+7%)

Fuel per day at sea

86.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,399 t

CO₂ emitted

45,023 t

Distance sailed

59,037 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,977 h

166 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 184 kg/nm · median 167 (+10%)

78.9Ranks 1,115 of 1,974, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 13.5 (+18%)

9.6Faster than 88% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.5 (−37%)

7.33Ranks 529 of 1,974, lowest first51.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports41%
From the EU25%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,441 t

3.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

JAZAN
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

JAZAN
Container median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

JAZAN
Container median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	+2.9 kn	−10%	+11%	+7%	−27%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.0 kn	+3%	−5%	−32%	+36%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.2 kn	−10%	+7%	+648%	+2%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.9 kn	−2%	−27%	−60%	−23%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.6 kn	−15%	+2%	−64%	−36%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.7 kn	+9%	−4%	−10%	+12%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Marlow Ship Management Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	Marlow Ship Management Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG	7,748	24,210	42,134	2,645	15.9	184	11.1	–
2023	not published	8,050	25,293	39,501	3,049	13.0	204	15.2	–
2022	not published	11,585	36,453	58,460	4,176	14.0	198	11.1	–
2021	not published	1,719	5,398	7,812	662	11.8	220	10.9	–
2020	not published	4,371	13,825	19,378	1,230	15.7	226	14.2	–
2019	not published	14,100	44,113	53,191	4,054	13.1	265	22.2	–
2018	not published	14,399	45,023	59,037	3,977	14.8	244	19.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Marlow Ship Management Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2024	Marlow Ship Management Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG	11.1	17.5	−37%	529 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	15.2	19.4	−22%	735 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	11.1	19.1	−42%	411 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	10.9	17.9	−39%	394 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	14.2	17.6	−20%	677 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	22.2	18.9	+18%	1,039 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	19.8	20.2	−2%	822 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.