Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Marlow Ship Management Deutschland GmbH & Co. KGyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Marlow Ship Management Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 16 |
| CO₂ emitted | 246 kt+91.6% |
| Fuel per mile | 207 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 14.2 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 2.1% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Marlow Ship Management Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG7.6 (−53% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marlow Ship Management Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG | 10 | 7.6 | −53% | 230 | 14.7 | 3,548 | 2.0% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5
- Marlow Ship Management Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG25.6 (0%)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marlow Ship Management Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG | 5 | 25.6 | 0% | 70 | 11.7 | 2,190 | 4.4% | – |
| Segment median | 25.5 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marlow Ship Management Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG | DNV (16) | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Marlow Ship Management Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O7 GAJA | 9273791 | General cargo | 38.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +51% | 12.6 | 6,640 t | €22k |
| JEBEL ALI | 9525936 | Container | 7.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +9% | 16.1 | 22,585 t | €595k |
| AL RIFFA | 9525912 | Container | 7.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +5% | 14.8 | 37,632 t | €1.0m |
| ALULA EXPRESS | 9525883 | Container | 7.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +5% | 14.8 | 38,595 t | €1.1m |
| TAYMA EXPRESS | 9525895 | Container | 7.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +3% | 15.2 | 34,926 t | €950k |
| AL SAFAT | 9349497 | Container | 14.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | −1% | 14.0 | 41,819 t | €1.1m |
| AL MANAMAH | 9349538 | Container | 13.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | −9% | 14.5 | 48,160 t | €1.3m |
| ATLANTIC RUNNER II | 9509619 | General cargo | 12.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −50% | 10.2 | 4,617 t | €131k |
30 of 16 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.