Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK BATAM

IMO: 9355331
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 26,305 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.10 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 21,414 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

135

Container median 165 kg/nm (−18%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (+2%)

Average speed

14.0 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

45.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,153 t

CO₂ emitted

25,450 t

Distance sailed

60,327 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,300 h

179 days, 49% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 137 kg/nm · median 177 (−23%)

78.8Ranks 828 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.0 kn · median 13.3 (+5%)

9.1Faster than 59% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 16.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−1%)

7.22Ranks 1,093 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU45%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

7,639 t

94% of all fuel; 6% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

517 t

2.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAERSK BATAM
Container median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAERSK BATAM
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAERSK BATAM
Container median

16.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.4 kn	−12%	−20%	−11%	−18%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.4 kn	+15%	+26%	+8%	−1%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−21%	−23%	−0%	+15%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.3 kn	+5%	−10%	+33%	−12%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	−1%	+0%	−31%	−10%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+2.7 kn	+15%	+39%	+34%	+13%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	−9%	−16%	+4%	−12%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	7,962	24,682	58,136	4,164	14.0	137	16.1	98%
2024Bio blend	Maersk A/S	10,115	31,176	65,153	4,231	15.4	155	19.6	99%
2023	not published	8,153	25,450	60,327	4,300	14.0	135	19.7	94%
2022LNG / alt.	not published	10,342	20,017	60,428	4,196	14.4	171	17.2	99%
2021	not published	7,461	23,395	45,570	2,734	16.7	164	19.5	–
2020	not published	10,890	34,062	65,907	4,011	16.4	165	21.6	100%
2019	not published	7,045	22,026	49,078	3,594	13.7	144	19.1	100%
2018	not published	7,432	23,160	47,311	3,190	14.8	157	21.6	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	16.1	16.3	−1%	1,093 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024Bio blend	Maersk A/S	19.6	17.5	+12%	1,111 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	19.7	19.4	+2%	970 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	17.2	19.1	−10%	825 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	19.5	17.9	+9%	967 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	21.6	17.6	+23%	1,082 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	19.1	18.9	+1%	912 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	21.6	20.2	+7%	922 of 1,705	ABS	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.