Navalyze · Container · Ship

RIJNBORG

IMO: 9355812
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 11,499 t
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Delfzijl
Technical efficiency: EEXI 20.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Wagenborg Shipping BV · part of Wagenborg

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,645 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

127

Container median 186 kg/nm (−32%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

41.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (+133%)

Average speed

14.9 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

45.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,103 t

CO₂ emitted

16,127 t

Distance sailed

40,146 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,690 h

112 days, 31% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 120 kg/nm · median 177 (−32%)

78.8Ranks 707 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.1 kn · median 13.3 (−32%)

9.1Faster than 10% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 33.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+103%)

7.22Ranks 1,742 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports89%
From the EU1%
Into the EU1%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,484 t

9.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

RIJNBORG
Container median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

RIJNBORG
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

RIJNBORG
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	+4%	+5%	−4%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	−1.2 kn	−9%	−20%	+9%	−29%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−12%	−13%	+25%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−4.5 kn	+13%	−21%	−38%	+20%	4.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+5.6 kn	−4%	+54%	+618%	+12%	5.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.3 kn	+3%	+92%	−82%	−15%	4.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.7 kn	−10%	−33%	−23%	+1%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Wagenborg Shipping BV	3,895	12,357	32,555	3,579	9.1	120	33.0	–
2024	Wagenborg Shipping BV	3,888	12,284	33,948	3,769	9.0	115	35.9	–
2023	not published	3,924	12,399	31,089	3,037	10.2	126	50.2	–
2022	not published	3,584	11,418	24,971	2,403	10.4	144	50.1	–
2021	not published	5,103	16,127	40,146	2,690	14.9	127	41.7	–
2020	not published	741	2,350	5,590	603	9.3	133	37.2	–
2019	not published	3,886	12,314	30,327	6,062	5.0	128	43.7	–
2018	not published	5,601	17,487	39,192	5,856	6.7	143	43.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Wagenborg Shipping BV	33.0	16.3	+103%	1,742 of 2,208	Bureau Veritas	C
2024	Wagenborg Shipping BV	35.9	17.5	+105%	1,557 of 1,974	Bureau Veritas	C
2023	not published	50.2	19.4	+159%	1,684 of 1,899	Bureau Veritas	C
2022	not published	50.1	19.1	+162%	1,613 of 1,825	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	41.7	17.9	+133%	1,501 of 1,781	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	37.2	17.6	+111%	1,438 of 1,797	Bureau Veritas	C
2019	not published	43.7	18.9	+131%	1,477 of 1,788	Bureau Veritas	C
2018	not published	43.3	20.2	+114%	1,395 of 1,705	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.