Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Wagenborgyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Wagenborg | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 67 |
| CO₂ emitted | 370 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 52 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 9.9 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 4.4% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | General cargo |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
General cargo
CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 25.5
- Wagenborg16.0 (−37% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wagenborg | 57 | 16.0 | −37% | 48 | 9.9 | 3,499 | 4.4% | – |
| Segment median | 25.5 | 0% |
Ro-ro
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 95.2
- Wagenborg32.8 (−66% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wagenborg | 3 | 32.8 | −66% | 81 | 13.0 | 5,171 | 3.7% | – |
| Segment median | 95.2 | 0% |
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Wagenborg33.0 (+102% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wagenborg | 1 | 33.0 | +102% | 120 | 9.1 | 3,579 | 4.9% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Offshore
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 1,367
- Wagenborg8,213 (+501% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wagenborg | 6 | 8,213 | +501% | 112 | 2.0 | 1,544 | 10.5% | – |
| Segment median | 1,367 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wagenborg | Bureau Veritas (67) | 93% | 6% | 1% | 0% |
Wagenborg: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIJNBORG | 9355812 | Container | 33.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +49% | 9.1 | 12,357 t | €372k |
| KASTEELBORG | 9732204 | Offshore | 4,401 g CO₂/t·nm | 3,555 | +24% | 1.7 | 4,631 t | €0 |
| NASSAUBORG | 9248564 | General cargo | 27.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | +9% | 10.1 | 6,069 t | €224k |
| KEIZERSBORG | 9779458 | Offshore | 3,755 g CO₂/t·nm | 3,555 | +6% | 5.4 | 150 t | €0 |
| DIEZEBORG | 9225586 | General cargo | 25.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | 0% | 10.8 | 6,199 t | €254k |
| ADRIATICBORG | 9546497 | General cargo | 25.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −1% | 10.6 | 5,210 t | €135k |
| DINTELBORG | 9163685 | General cargo | 23.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −8% | 9.5 | 6,831 t | €249k |
| LINGEBORG | 9399399 | General cargo | 23.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −10% | 8.7 | 4,874 t | €0 |
| ANDESBORG | 9466324 | General cargo | 22.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −12% | 11.9 | 6,846 t | €194k |
| AMSTELBORG | 9333527 | General cargo | 22.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −13% | 11.5 | 6,439 t | €203k |
| ATLANTICBORG | 9466350 | General cargo | 22.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −13% | 9.3 | 5,881 t | €159k |
| LAGANBORG | 9407419 | General cargo | 21.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −16% | 9.4 | 4,895 t | €0 |
| DONGEBORG | 9163697 | General cargo | 20.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −19% | 10.0 | 6,850 t | €300k |
| LAUWERSBORG | 9399387 | General cargo | 20.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −20% | 8.8 | 3,911 t | €0 |
| MOEZELBORG | 9180839 | General cargo | 19.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −24% | 9.6 | 5,384 t | €222k |
| AVONBORG | 9466362 | General cargo | 19.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −24% | 7.9 | 1,305 t | €41k |
| MISSOURIBORG | 9228978 | General cargo | 18.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −27% | 10.0 | 6,907 t | €221k |
| VOORNEBORG | 9179373 | General cargo | 18.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −27% | 9.0 | 5,391 t | €197k |
| LOIREBORG | 9399404 | General cargo | 18.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −28% | 9.5 | 4,144 t | €0 |
| AMURBORG | 9466336 | General cargo | 17.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −31% | 10.2 | 5,094 t | €141k |
| ALAMOSBORG | 9466348 | General cargo | 17.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −31% | 11.6 | 6,164 t | €183k |
| ARNEBORG | 9333539 | General cargo | 17.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −32% | 11.9 | 5,197 t | €156k |
| VAASABORG | 9196242 | General cargo | 17.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −32% | 10.3 | 4,981 t | €193k |
| MISSISSIPPIBORG | 9207508 | General cargo | 17.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −32% | 10.3 | 6,181 t | €258k |
| ORANJEBORG | 9232797 | Ro-ro | 33.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 49.0 | −32% | 11.3 | 14,528 t | €346k |
| VANCOUVERBORG | 9213741 | General cargo | 17.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −33% | 9.8 | 4,165 t | €152k |
| TRINITYBORG | 9546485 | General cargo | 17.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −33% | 11.1 | 2,435 t | €66k |
| BOTHNIABORG | 9267728 | Ro-ro | 32.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 49.0 | −33% | 13.8 | 18,479 t | €876k |
| VICTORIABORG | 9234276 | General cargo | 17.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −33% | 10.8 | 6,180 t | €244k |
| VIRGINIABORG | 9234290 | General cargo | 16.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm | 25.5 | −34% | 10.4 | 6,277 t | €240k |
30 of 67 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.