Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

ZEUGMA SEAWAYS

IMO: 9356737
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 4,811 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: UN AKDENIZ

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S. · part of DFDS

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,493 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

113

Ro-ro median 107 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

64.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 109 (−41%)

Average speed

17.0 kn

Ro-ro median 14.6 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

46.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,440 t

CO₂ emitted

41,866 t

Distance sailed

119,014 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,992 h

291 days, 80% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 116 kg/nm · median 105 (+11%)

56.6Ranks 145 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 17.8 kn · median 14.4 (+24%)

10.9Faster than 97% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 75.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (−21%)

47.4Ranks 76 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU50%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

331 t

0.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ZEUGMA SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

100.0105.0110.0115.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ZEUGMA SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

14.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ZEUGMA SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

40.060.080.0100120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	−0%	+6%	+6%	+19%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	+3%	+2%	−2%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−1%	−5%	+18%	+7%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−4%	−3%	−10%	−8%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+0%	−1%	+11%	+3%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−1%	−3%	−9%	−1%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	+1%	−1%	−17%	−5%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	14,384	44,811	124,199	6,984	17.8	116	75.0	–
2024	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	13,547	42,204	116,686	6,944	16.8	116	63.0	–
2023	not published	13,440	41,866	119,014	6,992	17.0	113	64.0	–
2022	not published	11,527	35,911	100,731	5,731	17.6	114	59.8	–
2021	not published	13,306	41,449	111,620	6,444	17.3	119	65.4	–
2020	not published	11,906	37,199	100,246	5,695	17.6	119	63.6	–
2019	not published	13,270	41,366	110,614	6,121	18.1	120	64.0	–
2018	not published	15,684	48,853	132,608	7,163	18.5	118	67.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	75.0	95.2	−21%	76 of 235	DNV	B
2024	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	63.0	97.5	−35%	42 of 220	DNV	A
2023	not published	64.0	109	−41%	40 of 221	DNV	A
2022	not published	59.8	90.6	−34%	33 of 223	DNV	A
2021	not published	65.4	104	−37%	46 of 219	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	63.6	103	−38%	47 of 238	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	64.0	90.9	−30%	61 of 271	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	67.7	91.0	−26%	66 of 260	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.