Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

VOLCAN DE TAMADABA

IMO
9360506
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
Spain
Port of registry
Las Palmas De Gran Canaria
Technical efficiency
EIV 28.03 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated)
Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.

?
?

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
175
Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (+11%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
593
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 626 (−5%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
404
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 253 (+60%)
Average speed
18.1 kn
Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (+13%)
Fuel per day at sea
76.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
10,550 t
CO₂ emitted
32,898 t
Distance sailed
60,220 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,327 h
139 days, 38% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 150 kg/nm · median 150 (+0%)
69.3Ranks 204 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 15.9 kn · median 15.8 (+1%)
12.0Faster than 51% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 239 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−58%)
66.8Ranks 128 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 452 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+79%)
48.6Ranks 266 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports67%
  • From the EU12%
  • Into the EU13%
  • At berth in the EU8%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2,648 t
8.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • VOLCAN DE TAMADABA
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • VOLCAN DE TAMADABA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • VOLCAN DE TAMADABA
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • VOLCAN DE TAMADABA
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.8 kn−7%−12%−18%−48%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024−0.8 kn−7%−11%+19%−52%0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023−0.6 kn−1%−4%−3%+61%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.0 kn−0%−0%+4%+31%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021−0.5 kn−5%−8%+24%−13%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020+0.4 kn−5%−3%−27%−9%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+0.2 kn+1%+2%+2%−92%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Bio blendNAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.8,59026,59257,2093,60715.9150––
2024NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.11,24435,05969,4734,17016.7162––
2023not published10,14231,62758,4003,33717.5174––
2022not published10,55032,89860,2203,32718.1175––
2021not published10,21731,85058,1383,20918.1176––
2020not published8,72827,23846,9662,53018.6186––
2019not published12,52139,02464,0113,52318.2196––
2018not published12,24138,14863,0083,49818.0194––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Bio blendNAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.239567−58%128 of 408452253+79%Bureau VeritasB
2024NAVIERA ARMAS, S.A.456547−17%185 of 404358233+54%Bureau VeritasB
2023not published953680+40%252 of 386469234+101%Bureau VeritasA+B
2022not published593626−5%192 of 394404253+60%Bureau VeritasA+B
2021not published452815−45%143 of 377427226+89%Bureau VeritasA+B
2020not published521751−31%158 of 387532217+145%Bureau VeritasA+B
2019not published571569+0%199 of 394571223+157%Bureau VeritasA+B
2018not published7,543729+935%355 of 361768184+317%Bureau VeritasA+B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.