Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

FRAIHA

IMO: 9360817
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.13 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd · part of MOL

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

366

LNG carrier median 308 kg/nm (+19%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

11.1

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (+2%)

Average speed

14.3 kn

LNG carrier median 13.5 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

125.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,936 t

CO₂ emitted

37,320 t

Distance sailed

32,606 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,286 h

95 days, 26% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 286 kg/nm · median 190 (+50%)

152Ranks 312 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 14.4 (+3%)

11.2Faster than 60% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.60 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+21%)

5.06Ranks 247 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU37%
Into the EU62%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

358 t

1.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FRAIHA
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FRAIHA
LNG carrier median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

FRAIHA
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’192019’202020’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	−12%	−14%	−19%	−20%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+1.3 kn	−8%	+1%	+272%	+2%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−2.6 kn	−4%	−19%	+11%	−31%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	−0.2 kn	+2%	+1%	+34%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+2.4 kn	−2%	+14%	−49%	+77%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.8 kn	+16%	+59%	+171%	–	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd	10,810	33,596	37,026	2,445	15.1	292	–	–
2025	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	21,151	65,743	73,964	4,980	14.9	286	–	–
2024	MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd	29,722	92,453	91,703	6,035	15.2	324	–	–
2023	not published	8,642	26,997	24,629	1,775	13.9	351	–	–
2022	not published	8,103	25,555	22,129	1,342	16.5	366	–	–
2020	not published	5,930	18,699	16,575	994	16.7	358	–	–
2019	not published	11,936	37,320	32,606	2,286	14.3	366	–	–
2018	not published	3,788	11,808	12,052	1,152	10.5	314	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+B+C
2025	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	8.60	7.12	+21%	247 of 386	ClassNK	A+B+C
2024	MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd	10.7	7.39	+45%	237 of 312	DNV	A+B+C
2023	not published	10.5	9.10	+15%	223 of 355	DNV	A+B+C
2022	not published	15.2	10.4	+46%	297 of 379	DNV	A+B+C
2020	not published	19.7	10.7	+84%	247 of 267	DNV	A+B+C
2019	not published	11.1	10.9	+2%	129 of 248	DNV	A+B+C
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.