Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL UTOURIYA

IMO: 9360867
Type: LNG carrier
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.52 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd · part of NYK

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

307.3 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 190.4 kg/nm (+61%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

15.28

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.12 (+115%)

Average speed

13.9 kn

LNG carrier median 14.4 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

102.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,149 t

CO₂ emitted

40,532 t

41,148 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

42,791 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,071 h

128 days, 35% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 307.3 kg/nm · median 190.4 (+61%)

152.1Ranks 335 of 386, lowest first319.4

Average speedThis ship 13.9 kn · median 14.4 (−3%)

11.2Faster than 38% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 15.28 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+115%)

5.06Ranks 342 of 386, lowest first16.14

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU63%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU1%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (20,452 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.6 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

AL UTOURIYA
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL UTOURIYA
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

AL UTOURIYA
LNG carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	−5%	−12%	−0%	+86%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−12%	−15%	+102%	−35%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	−2%	+6%	−58%	−7%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	+11%	+1%	+705%	+79%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.1 kn	−2%	−8%	−81%	−52%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	−5%	−2%	−35%	+37%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.1 kn	−16%	+4%	+167%	+12%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd	13,149	40,532	42,791	3,071	13.9	307.3	–	–
2024part-year	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	7,598	23,312	24,865	1,655	15.0	305.6	–	–
2024	NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd	13,941	42,704	42,959	2,871	15.0	324.5	–	–
2023	not published	7,863	24,493	21,232	1,383	15.4	370.4	–	–
2022	not published	19,075	59,772	50,499	3,541	14.3	377.7	–	–
2021	not published	2,141	6,756	6,271	400	15.7	341.4	–	–
2020	not published	11,226	35,416	32,320	1,925	16.8	347.4	–	–
2019	not published	18,023	55,919	49,516	3,018	16.4	364.0	–	–
2018	not published	8,061	24,834	18,574	1,400	13.3	434.0	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd	15.28	7.12	+115%	342 of 386	ClassNK	A+C
2024part-year	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2024	NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd	8.23	7.39	+11%	180 of 312	ClassNK	B+C
2023	not published	12.69	9.10	+39%	275 of 355	ClassNK	B+C
2022	not published	13.69	10.38	+32%	276 of 379	ClassNK	B+C
2021	not published	7.66	10.46	−27%	82 of 289	ClassNK	B+C
2020	not published	16.11	10.71	+50%	231 of 267	ClassNK	B+C
2019	not published	11.77	10.87	+8%	145 of 248	ClassNK	B+C
2018	not published	10.53	10.92	−4%	87 of 197	ClassNK	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.