Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL UTOURIYA

IMO: 9360867
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands (from the 2023 report)
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.52 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd · part of NYK

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

347

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (+17%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

16.1

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (+50%)

Average speed

16.8 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (+14%)

Fuel per day at sea

140.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,226 t

CO₂ emitted

35,416 t

Distance sailed

32,320 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,925 h

80 days, 22% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 307 kg/nm · median 190 (+61%)

152Ranks 335 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 13.9 kn · median 14.4 (−3%)

11.2Faster than 38% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 15.3 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+115%)

5.06Ranks 342 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU63%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

779 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL UTOURIYA
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL UTOURIYA
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

AL UTOURIYA
LNG carrier median

5.07.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	−5%	−12%	−0%	+86%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−12%	−15%	+102%	−35%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.1 kn	−2%	+6%	−58%	−7%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	+11%	+1%	+705%	+79%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.1 kn	−2%	−8%	−81%	−52%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.4 kn	−5%	−2%	−35%	+37%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+3.1 kn	−16%	+4%	+167%	+12%	3.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd	13,149	40,532	42,791	3,071	13.9	307	–	–
2024part-year	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	7,598	23,312	24,865	1,655	15.0	306	–	–
2024	NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd	13,941	42,704	42,959	2,871	15.0	325	–	–
2023	not published	7,863	24,493	21,232	1,383	15.4	370	–	–
2022	not published	19,075	59,772	50,499	3,541	14.3	378	–	–
2021	not published	2,141	6,756	6,271	400	15.7	341	–	–
2020	not published	11,226	35,416	32,320	1,925	16.8	347	–	–
2019	not published	18,023	55,919	49,516	3,018	16.4	364	–	–
2018	not published	8,061	24,834	18,574	1,400	13.3	434	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd	15.3	7.12	+115%	342 of 386	ClassNK	A+C
2024part-year	NYK LNG Shipmanagement (UK) Ltd.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	B+C
2024	NYK LNG Shipmanagement Ltd	8.23	7.39	+11%	180 of 312	ClassNK	B+C
2023	not published	12.7	9.10	+39%	275 of 355	ClassNK	B+C
2022	not published	13.7	10.4	+32%	276 of 379	ClassNK	B+C
2021	not published	7.66	10.5	−27%	82 of 289	ClassNK	B+C
2020	not published	16.1	10.7	+50%	231 of 267	ClassNK	B+C
2019	not published	11.8	10.9	+8%	145 of 248	ClassNK	B+C
2018	not published	10.5	10.9	−4%	87 of 197	ClassNK	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.