Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL HUWAILA

IMO: 9360879
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.27 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Seapeak Maritime Limited · part of Seapeak

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

344

LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+49%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

11.1

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+22%)

Average speed

14.6 kn

LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

120.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,806 t

CO₂ emitted

49,288 t

Distance sailed

45,998 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,146 h

131 days, 36% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 310 kg/nm · median 190 (+63%)

152Ranks 338 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 15.5 kn · median 14.4 (+8%)

11.2Faster than 82% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.46 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+33%)

5.06Ranks 275 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU47%
Into the EU52%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

720 t

1.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL HUWAILA
LNG carrier median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL HUWAILA
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

AL HUWAILA
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−5%	−5%	−25%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	−5%	+0%	+56%	−19%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	−14%	−20%	−14%	−11%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+3%	−2%	+261%	+10%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	−2%	+4%	−57%	−1%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	+10%	+17%	+37%	+10%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.3 kn	+4%	+14%	−4%	+12%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Seapeak Maritime Limited	16,754	51,646	53,995	3,488	15.5	310	–	–
2024	Seapeak Maritime Limited	23,597	72,568	71,914	4,686	15.3	328	–	–
2023	not published	15,806	49,288	45,998	3,146	14.6	344	–	–
2022	not published	21,575	67,022	53,778	3,430	15.7	401	–	–
2021	not published	5,792	18,020	14,898	906	16.4	389	–	–
2020	not published	13,572	42,116	34,271	2,213	15.5	396	–	–
2019	not published	8,986	27,987	25,063	1,710	14.7	359	–	–
2018	not published	9,011	28,107	26,140	1,951	13.4	345	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Seapeak Maritime Limited	9.46	7.12	+33%	275 of 386	DNV	A+C
2024	Seapeak Maritime Limited	9.05	7.39	+22%	198 of 312	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	11.1	9.10	+22%	245 of 355	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	12.5	10.4	+20%	254 of 379	DNV	A+C
2021	not published	11.4	10.5	+9%	164 of 289	DNV	A+C
2020	not published	11.5	10.7	+8%	159 of 267	DNV	A+C
2019	not published	10.5	10.9	−4%	117 of 248	DNV	A+C
2018	not published	9.33	10.9	−15%	56 of 197	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.