Navalyze

Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

COTENTIN

IMO
9364978
Type
Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated)
France
Port of registry
Cherbourg
Technical efficiency
EEXI 23.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
STENA BALTICA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Brittany Ferries BAI SA

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
126
Ro-pax median 153 kg/nm (−18%)
CO₂ per transport work (pax)
2,669
g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 680 (+292%)
CO₂ per transport work (freight)
208
g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 234 (−11%)
Average speed
15.5 kn
Ro-pax median 16.0 kn (−3%)
Fuel per day at sea
46.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
10,591 t
CO₂ emitted
33,954 t
Distance sailed
84,217 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
5,436 h
227 days, 62% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 146 kg/nm · median 150 (−3%)
69.3Ranks 187 of 408, lowest first232
Average speedThis ship 17.1 kn · median 15.8 (+8%)
12.0Faster than 63% of ro-pax ships22.3
CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 2,165 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (+282%)
66.8Ranks 386 of 408, lowest first1,569
CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 142 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (−44%)
48.6Ranks 135 of 408, lowest first1,247
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports38%
  • From the EU27%
  • Into the EU27%
  • At berth in the EU8%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2,869 t
8.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • COTENTIN
  • Ro-pax median

Average speed, kn

  • COTENTIN
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

  • COTENTIN
  • Ro-pax median

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

  • COTENTIN
  • Ro-pax median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+2.8 kn+16%+38%+6%−4%2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−1.2 kn+0%−7%−6%−15%1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+0.3 kn−1%+1%+12%−50%0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022+1.7 kn−7%+5%+45%+7,484%1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−2.6 kn+9%−9%−30%−95%2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+0.2 kn+5%+5%−28%+71%Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019+0.5 kn+4%+8%−1%−31%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Brittany Ferries BAI SA12,27338,72683,9724,92517.1146––
2024Brittany Ferries BAI SA9,93731,85078,9435,51414.3126––
2023not published10,59133,95484,2175,43615.5126––
2022not published9,59030,74675,5054,95715.2127––
2021not published7,09322,71652,1463,85813.5136––
2020not published9,24729,13874,1114,60116.1125––
2019not published12,24938,598102,5726,43215.9119––
2018not published11,86137,379103,3056,70915.4115––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nmRo-pax medianvs Ro-paxRankFreight, g CO₂/t·nmRo-pax median vs Ro-pax VerifierMethods
2025Brittany Ferries BAI SA2,165567+282%386 of 408142253−44%Bureau VeritasA
2024Brittany Ferries BAI SA2,261547+314%372 of 404137233−41%Bureau VeritasA
2023not published2,669680+292%374 of 386208234−11%Bureau VeritasA
2022not published5,342626+753%392 of 394271253+7%Bureau VeritasA
2021not published70.4815−91%46 of 377683226+202%Bureau VeritasA
2020not published1,379751+84%272 of 387167217−23%Bureau Veritas–
2019not published804569+41%243 of 394112223−50%Lloyd's Register–
2018not published1,159729+59%242 of 361107184−42%Lloyd's RegisterC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.