Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

PASCAL LOTA

IMO: 9365398
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Italy
Port of registry: Genova
Technical efficiency: EIV 3.61 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Forship SpA

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

238

Ro-pax median 157 kg/nm (+52%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

87.1

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 751 (−88%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

843

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 217 (+288%)

Average speed

18.3 kn

Ro-pax median 15.8 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

104.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,578 t

CO₂ emitted

45,554 t

Distance sailed

61,309 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,354 h

140 days, 38% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2025

Set against all 408 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 205 kg/nm · median 150 (+36%)

69.3Ranks 339 of 408, lowest first232

Average speedThis ship 16.6 kn · median 15.8 (+5%)

12.0Faster than 58% of ro-pax ships22.3

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 77.3 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 567 (−86%)

66.8Ranks 48 of 408, lowest first1,569

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 780 g CO₂/t·nm · median 253 (+208%)

48.6Ranks 313 of 408, lowest first1,247

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports97%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,421 t

3.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PASCAL LOTA
Ro-pax median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PASCAL LOTA
Ro-pax median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

PASCAL LOTA
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

PASCAL LOTA
Ro-pax median

0.02004006008001,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	−4%	−5%	+44%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−3%	−1%	−19%	−6%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	−9%	−17%	−11%	−4%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−2%	−5%	−5%	+5%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+4%	+5%	+40%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−2.3 kn	−12%	−22%	−21%	+0%	2.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	+2%	+6%	−17%	−17%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Forship SpA	17,295	55,163	84,586	5,099	16.6	205	–	–
2024	Forship SpA	12,514	39,166	58,690	3,487	16.8	213	–	–
2023	not published	15,977	49,925	72,685	4,421	16.4	220	–	–
2022	not published	19,661	61,429	81,619	4,533	18.0	241	–	–
2021	not published	21,180	66,165	85,855	4,630	18.5	247	–	–
2020	not published	14,578	45,554	61,309	3,354	18.3	238	–	–
2019	not published	21,070	65,703	77,718	3,774	20.6	271	–	–
2018	not published	24,717	77,083	93,166	4,675	19.9	265	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2025	Forship SpA	77.3	567	−86%	48 of 408	780	253	+208%	RINA	C
2024	Forship SpA	78.4	547	−86%	56 of 404	854	233	+267%	RINA	C
2023	not published	83.4	680	−88%	46 of 386	838	234	+258%	RINA	C
2022	not published	87.3	626	−86%	56 of 394	816	253	+223%	RINA	A
2021	not published	83.5	815	−90%	52 of 377	932	226	+312%	RINA	A
2020	not published	87.1	751	−88%	64 of 387	843	217	+288%	RINA	A
2019	not published	87.1	569	−85%	69 of 394	854	223	+284%	RINA	C
2018	not published	105	729	−86%	67 of 361	865	184	+370%	RINA	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.