Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

NEW AMORGOS

IMO: 9370836
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 87,417 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.42 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NEW SHIPPING LIMITED

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 87,417 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

114.3 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (−11%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

4.12

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (−48%)

Average speed

8.6 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,098 t

CO₂ emitted

3,459 t

3,513 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

9,604 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,121 h

47 days, 13% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 114.3 kg/nm · median 128.5 (−11%)

76.1Ranks 573 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 8.6 kn · median 10.7 (−20%)

8.0Faster than 13% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 4.12 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−48%)

4.51Ranks 103 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU10%
Into the EU82%
At berth in the EU8%

54% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,872 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

8.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NEW AMORGOS
Oil tanker median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NEW AMORGOS
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NEW AMORGOS
Oil tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+4.1 kn	−76%	−53%	+52%	−87%	4.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 76%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.7 kn	+111%	+51%	−70%	+85%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 111%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−4.8 kn	+28%	−27%	−20%	+52%	4.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.9 kn	−0%	+21%	+4%	−18%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+8%	+11%	+4%	+65%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	+8%	+9%	−31%	+29%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−13%	−13%	−21%	−44%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	NEW SHIPPING LIMITED	1,098	3,459	9,604	1,121	8.6	114.3	4.12	–
2024	NEW SHIPPING LIMITED	2,961	9,331	6,320	1,416	4.5	468.6	32.30	–
2023	not published	4,651	14,727	20,938	3,353	6.2	222.1	17.49	–
2022	not published	4,564	14,442	26,262	2,387	11.0	173.8	11.48	–
2021	not published	4,418	13,928	25,347	2,792	9.1	174.3	14.02	–
2020	not published	3,933	12,494	24,478	2,769	8.8	160.7	8.50	–
2019	not published	5,312	16,664	35,713	4,070	8.8	148.7	6.60	–
2018	not published	7,739	24,204	45,444	5,161	8.8	170.3	11.80	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NEW SHIPPING LIMITED	4.12	7.95	−48%	103 of 1,665	ICS Verification Services	A
2024	NEW SHIPPING LIMITED	32.30	8.06	+301%	1,673 of 1,787	ICS Verification Services	A
2023	not published	17.49	8.44	+107%	1,484 of 1,797	Lloyd's Register	A
2022	not published	11.48	8.51	+35%	1,347 of 1,961	Lloyd's Register	A
2021	not published	14.02	8.86	+58%	1,331 of 1,789	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	8.50	9.03	−6%	853 of 1,870	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	6.60	8.83	−25%	535 of 1,919	Lloyd's Register	A
2018	not published	11.80	8.86	+33%	1,215 of 1,779	Lloyd's Register	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.