Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC KRYSTAL

IMO: 9372470
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 53,322 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.76 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL · part of MSC Group

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 39,416 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

210

Container median 178 kg/nm (+18%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−12%)

Average speed

15.4 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

77.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

16,584 t

CO₂ emitted

52,285 t

Distance sailed

78,912 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,111 h

213 days, 58% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 195 kg/nm · median 177 (+10%)

78.8Ranks 1,243 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.5 kn · median 13.3 (−6%)

9.1Faster than 37% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−30%)

7.22Ranks 726 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU43%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,935 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC KRYSTAL
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0260.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC KRYSTAL
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC KRYSTAL
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.0 kn	−1%	−20%	−59%	−35%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+3.6 kn	+7%	+39%	−25%	+1%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.5 kn	−12%	−32%	−70%	+3%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	+1%	−9%	+2%	+5%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.6 kn	+1%	+4%	−5%	+2%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.6 kn	−9%	−12%	−7%	+0%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+3.9 kn	−5%	+22%	+164%	−16%	3.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	1,426	4,445	7,332	587	12.5	195	11.4	–
2024	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	3,498	10,930	17,745	1,146	15.5	197	17.5	–
2023	not published	4,400	13,872	23,777	1,996	11.9	185	17.3	–
2022	not published	16,584	52,285	78,912	5,111	15.4	210	16.8	–
2021	not published	16,146	50,905	77,406	4,532	17.1	209	16.0	–
2020	not published	16,945	53,427	81,814	4,963	16.5	207	15.7	–
2019	not published	20,146	62,985	88,345	5,169	17.1	228	15.7	–
2018	not published	8,037	25,173	33,426	2,523	13.2	240	18.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	11.4	16.3	−30%	726 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	17.5	17.5	−0%	987 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	17.3	19.4	−11%	837 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	16.8	19.1	−12%	805 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	16.0	17.9	−11%	780 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	15.7	17.6	−11%	775 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	15.7	18.9	−17%	697 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	18.7	20.2	−8%	769 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.