Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

POINT FORTIN

IMO: 9375721
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.47 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

372

LNG carrier median 323 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

13.8

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.9 (+27%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

LNG carrier median 13.7 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

115.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

28,308 t

CO₂ emitted

81,258 t

Distance sailed

76,059 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,889 h

245 days, 67% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 271 kg/nm · median 190 (+43%)

152Ranks 300 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 15.5 kn · median 14.4 (+8%)

11.2Faster than 83% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 10.5 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+47%)

5.06Ranks 309 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU55%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

731 t

0.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

POINT FORTIN
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

POINT FORTIN
LNG carrier median

12.013.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

POINT FORTIN
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	−13%	−10%	+131%	−10%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2024	−0.2 kn	+13%	+11%	−45%	−23%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−10%	−14%	+23%	+115%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+3.6 kn	−13%	+14%	−54%	−67%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.7 kn	−5%	−11%	−55%	+53%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025LNG	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	6,748	18,667	24,866	1,605	15.5	271	–	–
2024LNG	MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd	3,347	8,780	10,770	716	15.0	311	–	–
2021LNG / alt.	not published	5,417	15,182	19,639	1,291	15.2	276	–	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	4,916	13,617	15,987	1,009	15.8	308	–	–
2019LNG / alt.	not published	12,109	34,610	34,407	2,827	12.2	352	–	–
2018LNG / alt.	not published	28,308	81,258	76,059	5,889	12.9	372	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025LNG	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	10.5	7.12	+47%	309 of 386	ClassNK	A+B+C
2024LNG	MOL LNG Transport (Europe) Ltd	11.6	7.39	+58%	250 of 312	DNV	A+B+C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	15.0	10.5	+44%	231 of 289	DNV	A+B+C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	6.98	10.7	−35%	33 of 267	DNV	A+B+C
2019LNG / alt.	not published	21.2	10.9	+95%	221 of 248	DNV	A+B+C
2018LNG / alt.	not published	13.8	10.9	+27%	150 of 197	DNV	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.