Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

MAZARINE

IMO: 9376696
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 3,677 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.97 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SHIPLUX I S.A. · part of Shiplux

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,677 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

106.1 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (+1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

90.54

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (−5%)

Average speed

11.7 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,622 t

CO₂ emitted

17,645 t

17,921 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

52,998 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,533 h

189 days, 52% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 106.1 kg/nm · median 104.6 (+1%)

56.6Ranks 121 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 11.7 kn · median 14.4 (−19%)

10.9Faster than 16% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 90.54 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (−5%)

47.35Ranks 113 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports21%
From the EU36%
Into the EU37%
At berth in the EU7%

2% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (298 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

MAZARINE
Ro-ro median

95.0100.0105.0110.0115.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAZARINE
Ro-ro median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAZARINE
Ro-ro median

40.060.080.0100120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.1 kn	+10%	−7%	−25%	+26%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	−3%	+3%	+64%	−7%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.7 kn	−3%	−14%	−48%	+27%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	+4%	+9%	+20%	+2%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+0%	−3%	−19%	+16%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	−5%	−6%	+7%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+5.0 kn	−3%	+48%	+43%	−3%	5.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	SHIPLUX I S.A.	5,468	17,164	51,788	4,420	11.7	105.6	89.62	–
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	5,622	17,645	52,998	4,533	11.7	106.1	90.54	–
2024	SHIPLUX I S.A.	6,803	21,462	70,444	5,087	13.8	96.6	71.89	–
2023	not published	4,311	13,598	43,071	3,332	12.9	100.1	77.71	–
2022	not published	8,463	26,589	82,335	5,641	14.6	102.8	61.19	–
2021	not published	6,807	21,413	68,686	4,945	13.9	99.1	59.70	–
2020	not published	8,345	26,221	84,502	5,883	14.4	98.8	51.26	–
2019	not published	8,177	25,720	78,615	5,431	14.5	104.0	67.67	–
2018	not published	5,877	18,453	54,850	5,772	9.5	107.1	70.07	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	SHIPLUX I S.A.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+C
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	90.54	95.19	−5%	113 of 235	DNV	A+C
2024	SHIPLUX I S.A.	71.89	97.53	−26%	57 of 220	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	77.71	108.62	−28%	72 of 221	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	61.19	90.62	−32%	37 of 223	DNV	C
2021	not published	59.70	103.64	−42%	33 of 219	DNV	C
2020	not published	51.26	102.77	−50%	18 of 238	DNV	C
2019	not published	67.67	90.89	−26%	68 of 271	DNV	C
2018	not published	70.07	91.03	−23%	71 of 260	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.