Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

PALATINE

IMO: 9376701
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 3,571 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.30 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SHIPLUX II S.A. · part of CLdN

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,172 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

102

Ro-ro median 107 kg/nm (−5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

76.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 109 (−29%)

Average speed

12.7 kn

Ro-ro median 14.6 kn (−13%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,481 t

CO₂ emitted

17,294 t

Distance sailed

53,991 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,264 h

178 days, 49% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 97.7 kg/nm · median 105 (−7%)

56.6Ranks 97 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 12.0 kn · median 14.4 (−17%)

10.9Faster than 18% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 85.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (−10%)

47.4Ranks 100 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports5%
From the EU47%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,098 t

6.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PALATINE
Ro-ro median

95.0100.0105.0110.0115.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PALATINE
Ro-ro median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PALATINE
Ro-ro median

40.060.080.0100120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	+0%	−6%	+9%	+17%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.0 kn	−4%	−4%	−4%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−5%	−14%	−35%	+22%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.2 kn	+4%	+2%	−12%	+21%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+3%	+1%	+0%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	−6%	−1%	+18%	−20%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.6 kn	−1%	+4%	−1%	+23%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	SHIPLUX II S.A.	5,302	16,616	54,481	4,551	12.0	97.3	84.7	–
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	5,495	17,219	56,265	4,704	12.0	97.7	85.7	–
2024	SHIPLUX II S.A.	5,046	15,920	51,807	4,065	12.7	97.4	73.4	–
2023	not published	5,481	17,294	53,991	4,264	12.7	102	76.8	–
2022	not published	8,857	27,814	83,305	5,922	14.1	106	62.8	–
2021	not published	9,658	30,282	94,405	6,588	14.3	102	52.1	–
2020	not published	9,404	29,548	94,397	6,471	14.6	99.6	56.7	–
2019	not published	8,424	26,451	79,663	5,724	13.9	106	71.1	–
2018	not published	8,615	26,974	80,633	6,060	13.3	107	58.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	SHIPLUX II S.A.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+C
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	85.7	95.2	−10%	100 of 235	DNV	A+C
2024	SHIPLUX II S.A.	73.4	97.5	−25%	62 of 220	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	76.8	109	−29%	69 of 221	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	62.8	90.6	−31%	40 of 223	DNV	C
2021	not published	52.1	104	−50%	20 of 219	DNV	C
2020	not published	56.7	103	−45%	33 of 238	DNV	C
2019	not published	71.1	90.9	−22%	75 of 271	DNV	C
2018	not published	58.0	91.0	−36%	48 of 260	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.