Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

HIRADO

IMO: 9377420
Type: Oil tanker
Flag (estimated): France
Port of registry: Marseille
Technical efficiency: EEXI 2.19 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: CMB.TECH NV

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 160,818 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

178

Oil tanker median 138 kg/nm (+29%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

3.46

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.83 (−61%)

Average speed

12.3 kn

Oil tanker median 9.7 kn (+27%)

Fuel per day at sea

52.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,231 t

CO₂ emitted

28,826 t

Distance sailed

51,805 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,201 h

175 days, 48% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2019

Set against all 1,919 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2019 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 178 kg/nm · median 138 (+29%)

82.4Ranks 1,543 of 1,919, lowest first207

Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 9.7 (+27%)

6.1Faster than 94% of oil tanker ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 3.46 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.83 (−61%)

4.60Ranks 104 of 1,919, lowest first25.0

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU75%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

781 t

2.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HIRADO
Oil tanker median

100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’242024

Average speed, kn

HIRADO
Oil tanker median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HIRADO
Oil tanker median

2.04.06.08.010.0

’182018’192019

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2019→2024	–	–	–	–	–
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	−27%	−21%	+352%	+30%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	CMB.TECH NV	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2019	not published	9,231	28,826	51,805	4,201	12.3	178	3.46	–
2018	not published	2,798	8,740	11,455	1,001	11.4	244	2.67	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	CMB.TECH NV	–	–	–	–	EMICERT	A
2019	not published	3.46	8.83	−61%	104 of 1,919	EMICERT	A
2018	not published	2.67	8.86	−70%	57 of 1,779	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.