Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

CORAL FUNGIA

IMO: 9378292
Type: LNG carrier
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.30 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile

83.0 kg/nm

LNG carrier median 190.4 kg/nm (−56%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

59.41

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 7.12 (+734%)

Average speed

12.4 kn

LNG carrier median 14.4 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,614 t

CO₂ emitted

11,586 t

11,764 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

43,569 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,517 h

147 days, 40% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 83.0 kg/nm · median 190.4 (−56%)

152.1Ranks 12 of 386, lowest first319.4

Average speedThis ship 12.4 kn · median 14.4 (−14%)

11.2Faster than 16% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 59.41 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+734%)

5.06Ranks 379 of 386, lowest first16.14

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports24%
From the EU40%
Into the EU32%
At berth in the EU5%

64% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,470 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CORAL FUNGIA
LNG carrier median

50.0100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CORAL FUNGIA
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CORAL FUNGIA
LNG carrier median

0.050.0100150

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.4 kn	−5%	−2%	+30%	−4%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.7 kn	+31%	+16%	−56%	+45%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+1.8 kn	−5%	+10%	−4%	−2%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.4 kn	−0%	+25%	+69%	−60%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+2.1 kn	−15%	+8%	+27%	−13%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−3.7 kn	+36%	−9%	−12%	+27%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 36%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.	3,614	11,586	43,569	3,517	12.4	83.0	–	–
2024	Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.	2,933	9,335	33,629	2,791	12.0	87.2	–	–
2023	not published	5,035	15,889	75,622	5,533	13.7	66.6	–	–
2022	not published	5,485	17,370	78,492	6,620	11.9	69.9	–	–
2021	not published	3,247	10,281	46,313	4,899	9.5	70.1	109.05	–
2020	not published	3,013	9,533	36,446	4,915	7.4	82.7	125.41	–
2019	not published	2,530	8,000	41,520	3,742	11.1	60.9	98.50	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.	59.41	7.12	+734%	379 of 386	DNV	B
2024	Anthony Veder Rederijzaken B.V.	61.74	7.39	+735%	308 of 312	DNV	B
2023	not published	42.44	9.10	+366%	341 of 355	DNV	B
2022	not published	43.44	10.38	+318%	356 of 379	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	109.05	46.91	+132%	279 of 323	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	125.41	42.29	+197%	297 of 339	DNV	B
2019	not published	98.50	45.85	+115%	269 of 331	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.