Navalyze · Container · Ship

CLAIRE A

IMO: 9379387
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,493 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Izmir
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.01 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S. · part of Arkas

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,725 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

96.0

Container median 182 kg/nm (−47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+26%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−24%)

Fuel per day at sea

24.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,811 t

CO₂ emitted

15,006 t

Distance sailed

50,112 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,759 h

198 days, 54% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 104 kg/nm · median 177 (−41%)

78.8Ranks 576 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 8.0 kn · median 13.3 (−40%)

9.1Faster than 5% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 59.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+265%)

7.22Ranks 2,113 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU47%
Into the EU46%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

383 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CLAIRE A
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

CLAIRE A
Container median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CLAIRE A
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	+1.9 kn	−20%	+5%	+436%	+70%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	+3%	−14%	−93%	+22%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	+12%	−10%	+309%	−34%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	−10%	−11%	−75%	+11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	+31%	+30%	−47%	+81%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 31%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	−1%	−13%	−81%	−17%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	194	608	1,861	232	8.0	104	59.5	–
2023	not published	45	141	347	57	6.1	130	35.0	–
2022	not published	655	2,051	5,210	710	7.3	126	28.6	–
2021	not published	143	447	1,275	140	9.1	112	43.0	–
2020	not published	631	1,980	5,068	548	9.3	125	38.6	–
2019	not published	918	2,864	9,641	1,041	9.3	95.2	21.3	–
2018	not published	4,811	15,006	50,112	4,759	10.5	96.0	25.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.	59.5	16.3	+265%	2,113 of 2,208	DNV	A
2023	not published	35.0	19.4	+80%	1,453 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	28.6	19.1	+49%	1,257 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	43.0	17.9	+140%	1,516 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	38.6	17.6	+120%	1,457 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	21.3	18.9	+13%	1,017 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	25.5	20.2	+26%	1,055 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.