Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.
Ships39
CO₂ emitted344 kt−16.9%
Fuel per mile104 kg/nm
Average speed10.9 kn
CO₂ at berth3.9%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentContainer

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3

  • Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.28.1 (+73%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.3628.1+73%10510.92,4254.0%–
Segment median 16.30%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 7.9

  • Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.18.6 (+136%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.118.6+136%1069.01,1882.9%–
Segment median 7.90%

Oil tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0

  • Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.46.6 (+487%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.146.6+487%239.38621.4%–
Segment median 8.00%

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0

  • Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.79.8 (+431%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.179.8+431%337.82667.9%–
Segment median 15.00%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.DNV (39)100%0%0%0%

Arkas Denizcilik ve Nakliyat A.S.: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
ALACATI9486207Chemical tanker79.8 g CO₂/t·nm39.2+104%7.8219 t€6k
VERA A9372585Container90.1 g CO₂/t·nm44.8+101%8.52,740 t€78k
BAYRAKLI9418391Oil tanker46.6 g CO₂/t·nm27.1+72%9.3595 t€16k
MICHEL A9379349Container30.8 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+39%10.912,360 t€419k
CRISTINA A9337365Container30.7 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+38%8.96,072 t€199k
VIVIEN A9491848Container30.6 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+38%12.21,864 t€68k
DIANE A9385532Container30.4 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+37%8.86,894 t€194k
CLAIRE A9379387Container59.5 g CO₂/t·nm44.8+33%8.0608 t€18k
KARLA A9297577Container58.7 g CO₂/t·nm44.8+31%9.73,249 t€93k
MARTHA A9299484Container29.0 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+30%14.43,087 t€82k
MARGUERITE A9305893Container28.3 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+27%13.012,485 t€390k
HILDE A9305908Container28.0 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+26%11.511,225 t€383k
DANIEL A9238064Container54.9 g CO₂/t·nm44.8+23%7.85,346 t€157k
MARIO A9337377Container26.8 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+21%10.63,599 t€115k
ZEYNEP C9232151Bulk carrier18.6 g CO₂/t·nm15.5+20%9.03,609 t€98k
BERNARD A9415959Container25.7 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+16%11.04,187 t€150k
WANDA A9415947Container24.7 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+11%12.110,816 t€333k
SINE A9343089Container22.9 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+3%14.44,102 t€108k
TEOMAN A9226504Container22.4 g CO₂/t·nm22.2+1%12.117,534 t€576k
EMMA A9308194Container20.3 g CO₂/t·nm22.2−8%13.22,647 t€74k
CINZIA A9226516Container20.2 g CO₂/t·nm22.2−9%12.418,511 t€644k
STANLEY A9303807Container20.1 g CO₂/t·nm22.2−10%12.510,467 t€382k
GABRIEL A9300659Container40.4 g CO₂/t·nm44.8−10%6.55,015 t€152k
JEAN PIERRE A9379351Container40.2 g CO₂/t·nm44.8−10%8.59,755 t€277k
IZMIT EXPRESS9740665Container18.2 g CO₂/t·nm22.2−18%14.526,627 t€865k
ALLEGRI9127459Container18.1 g CO₂/t·nm22.2−18%10.38,826 t€295k
MERSIN EXPRESS9740653Container17.7 g CO₂/t·nm22.2−20%14.927,537 t€880k
GEMLIK EXPRESS9751107Container17.0 g CO₂/t·nm22.2−24%15.126,293 t€833k
ONUR G.A9238076Container33.8 g CO₂/t·nm44.8−25%7.86,140 t€206k
TANGER A9330939Container32.7 g CO₂/t·nm44.8−27%6.44,658 t€130k

30 of 43 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.