Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

MUT OZT

IMO: 9382114
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 3,476 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.51 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: FS SALOME, VS SALOME, TANKER BEE 10

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Q Shipping B.V.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 430 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

52.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

390

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

9.8 kn

Fuel per day at sea

12.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

125 t

CO₂ emitted

401 t

Distance sailed

2,393 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

244 h

10 days, 3% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 41.8 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−48%)

52.8Ranks 31 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 8.5 kn · median 11.1 (−23%)

8.8Faster than 8% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 38.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+157%)

7.93Ranks 1,295 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU39%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU20%

Fuel burned laden

86 t

69% of all fuel; 31% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

80 t

20.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MUT OZT
Chemical tanker median

40.060.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MUT OZT
Chemical tanker median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MUT OZT
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.5 kn	+4%	−11%	+150%	−8%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	−35%	−28%	+2%	−41%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 35%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.4 kn	+19%	+41%	+33%	+44%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+4.7 kn	−56%	+13%	+1,482%	–	4.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 56%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−6.8 kn	+124%	−32%	−62%	–	6.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 124%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020	−3.2 kn	−30%	−47%	+142%	–	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 30%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Q Shipping B.V.	2,024	6,489	48,368	5,702	8.5	41.8	38.6	–
2025	MARINPET PETROL DENIZCILIK TIC. LTD. STI.	2,024	6,489	48,368	5,702	8.5	41.8	38.6	–
2024part-year	Valloeby Salome Ltd	41	133	592	54	11.0	70.0	25.3	–
2024	Q Shipping B.V.	778	2,494	19,384	1,944	10.0	40.1	42.0	36%
2023	not published	1,174	3,764	19,070	2,100	9.1	61.6	71.7	42%
2022	not published	743	2,382	14,345	1,870	7.7	51.8	49.7	54%
2021	not published	106	340	907	304	3.0	117	158	16%
2020	not published	125	401	2,393	244	9.8	52.3	390	69%
2018	not published	74	231	988	76	13.0	74.5	56.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Q Shipping B.V.	–	–	–	–	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2025	MARINPET PETROL DENIZCILIK TIC. LTD. STI.	38.6	15.0	+157%	1,295 of 1,460	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2024part-year	Valloeby Salome Ltd	–	–	–	–	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2024	Q Shipping B.V.	42.0	16.7	+151%	1,148 of 1,274	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2023	not published	71.7	16.2	+342%	1,288 of 1,314	ABS	A
2022	not published	49.7	16.1	+209%	1,339 of 1,409	ABS	A
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	A
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A+B
2018	not published	56.0	17.1	+227%	1,231 of 1,294	Bureau Veritas	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.