Navalyze

Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2024

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

Side by side

All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.

Q Shipping B.V.
Ships9
CO₂ emitted21 kt
Fuel per mile53 kg/nm
Average speed10.3 kn
CO₂ at berth6.6%
Ships burning LNG0
Main segmentChemical tanker

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Chemical tanker

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.7

  • Q Shipping B.V.43.0 (+157%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Q Shipping B.V.243.0+157%4810.02,8148.8%–
Segment median 16.70%

Bulk carrier

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.1

  • Q Shipping B.V.8.9 (+10%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Q Shipping B.V.48.9+10%7510.81,5015.9%–
Segment median 8.10%

General cargo

CO₂ per transport work (dwt) in g CO₂/dwt·nm · segment median 19.3

  • Q Shipping B.V.17.2 (−11%)
  • ← betterworse →
ShipsPer workvs medianFuel kg/nmSpeed knHours at seaAt berthLNG
Q Shipping B.V.317.2−11%4110.41,6713.5%–
Segment median 19.30%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

Verifiers (ships)A · delivery notesB · tank monitoringC · flow metersD · direct
Q Shipping B.V.Polish Register of Shipping (9)0%100%0%0%

Q Shipping B.V.: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

ShipIMOSegmentCO₂ per transport workSize-band medianvs medianSpeed knCO₂Allowances
TANKER BEE 119356646Chemical tanker43.9 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+6%10.16,135 t€158k
PENA MED9667057Bulk carrier10.1 g CO₂/t·nm9.7+4%10.74,865 t€29k
BULKER BEE 109507087General cargo19.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm19.3+2%10.22,232 t€37k
TANKER BEE 109382114Chemical tanker42.0 g CO₂/t·nm41.2+2%10.02,494 t€51k
MINA LONDON9489974Bulk carrier7.7 g CO₂/t·nm9.7−21%11.02,843 t€30k
BULKER BEE 119507075General cargo14.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm19.3−24%10.72,239 t€36k

30 of 9 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

  • Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
  • Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
  • Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
  • Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
  • Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.