Navalyze · Container · Ship

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED · part of MSC Group

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,162 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

70.5

Container median 182 kg/nm (−61%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

27.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+36%)

Average speed

10.3 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (−25%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,436 t

CO₂ emitted

14,074 t

Distance sailed

62,911 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,093 h

254 days, 70% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 85.2 kg/nm · median 177 (−52%)

78.8Ranks 336 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.9 kn · median 13.3 (−26%)

9.1Faster than 14% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 41.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+153%)

7.22Ranks 1,901 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports83%
From the EU4%
Into the EU7%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

812 t

5.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MARTI STAR
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MARTI STAR
Container median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MARTI STAR
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.6 kn	+17%	+10%	+52%	+4%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2024	−1.6 kn	−23%	−34%	−18%	−14%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 23%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	+19%	+45%	−36%	+52%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	+13%	+9%	−27%	+10%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	3,124	9,768	36,680	3,709	9.9	85.2	41.3	–
2024part-year	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	981	3,054	14,688	1,169	12.6	66.8	34.4	–
2024part-year	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	1,755	5,487	24,087	2,301	10.5	72.8	39.6	–
2020	not published	2,784	8,827	29,316	2,422	12.1	95.0	46.1	–
2019	not published	3,640	11,488	45,640	4,562	10.0	79.8	30.3	–
2018	not published	4,436	14,074	62,911	6,093	10.3	70.5	27.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MSC SHIPMANAGEMENT LIMITED	41.3	16.3	+153%	1,901 of 2,208	DNV	C
2024part-year	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2024part-year	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	–	–	–	–	DNV	C
2024	MSC Shipmanagement Ltd	39.6	17.5	+126%	1,617 of 1,974	DNV	C
2020	not published	46.1	17.6	+162%	1,562 of 1,797	Korean Register	B
2019	not published	30.3	18.9	+60%	1,269 of 1,788	Korean Register	B
2018	not published	27.4	20.2	+36%	1,113 of 1,705	Korean Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.